search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (2019), 40, 228–231 doi:10.1017/ice.2018.325


Concise Communication


Use of diagnostic stewardship practices to improve urine culturing among SHEA Research Network hospitals


Kaede V. Sullivan MD, MSc1, Daniel J. Morgan MD, MS2,3 and Surbhi Leekha MD, MPH2 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland and 3Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, Maryland


Abstract


This survey investigated interventions used by acute-care hospitals to reduce the detection of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Half of the respondents reported using reflex urine cultures but with varied urinalysis criteria and perceived outcomes. Other diagnostic stewardship interventions for urine culture ordering and specimen quality were less common.


(Received 31 August 2018; accepted 24 November 2018; electronically published 7 December 2018)


Asymptomatic bacteriuria often leads to inappropriate anti- microbial use.1 If culturing is associated with nonspecific symp- toms such as fever, a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) may be reported.2 Diagnostic stewardship strategies that reduce laboratory detection of asymptomatic bacteriuria may help to mitigate these negative outcomes. We conducted a survey to investigate the interventions used by acute-care hospitals to reduce unnecessary laboratory detection of asymptomatic bacteriuria.


Methods Survey development and administration


We conducted a survey on adult urine culturing practices among acute-care hospitals in the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology Research Network (SRN). A 16-item survey was created using Magnet Mail Surveys software. The survey recorded demographic characteristics of the respondent institutions; institutional prac- tices pertaining to urine culture ordering, urine collection, and transport; and in institutions that offer reflex urine cultures, the urine sources accepted for reflex testing, restriction of reflex urine cultures to specific patient populations, and strategic use of the electronic medical record (EMR) to guide orders toward reflex urine cultures. Reflex urine culture was described as follows: “Reflex urine culturing involves screening urine samples with a urinalysis (‘UA’) first. Urine is processed for culture only if pre- defined criteria are met.” Respondents were advised to consult with their laboratory for questions related to urine culture pro- cessing. The survey was e-mailed to SRN members on 3 occa- sions, and responses were accepted between March 22 and April


Author for correspondence: Kaede V. Sullivan, Temple University Hospital, 3401 Broad St, Room A2 F329, Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail: kaede.ota@tuhs.temple.edu Cite this article: Sullivan KV, et al. (2019). Use of diagnostic stewardship practices to


improve urine culturing among SHEA Research Network hospitals. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2019, 40, 228–231. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.325


© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.


30, 2018. Survey results were analyzed using JMP Pro 13 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


Results Survey demographics


The survey was e-mailed to the 132 members of the SRN; e-mails to 10 members bounced back or the member opted out. The response rate was 43% (52 of 122). Among respondents, 39 of 52 (75%) were based in the United States or Canada and 27 of 52 (52%) described themselves as an academic medical center. An additional 16 of 52 respondents (31%) affirmed an affiliation with a medical school.


Urine culture ordering


Questionnaire responses are summarized in the Supplementary Material online. Of respondents, 23 of 52 (44%) reported that their hospital had published indications for ordering a urine culture. Of these, 4 of 23 (17%) reported that an indication had to be entered into their EMR when ordering a urine culture.


Reflex urine culturing


Among respondents, 26 of 51 (51%; 66% in the United States and Canada and 8% of international respondents) reported that their laboratory offers reflex urine cultures. Of these 26 respondents, 14 (54%) reported that their EMR was configured to guide the ordering clinician preferentially toward reflex urine cultures. Stra- tegies included placing the reflex urine culture option at the top of a list of options with routine urine culture located further down the list and/or having the reflex urine culture option “pre-checked.” Table 1 summarizes the respondents using reflex urine culture.


Among them, 25 of 26 respondents (96%) reported being able to order urine culture without a urinalysis, but 5 of 26 (19%) indi- cated restriction of “urine culture only” orders to certain


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156