search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
846 infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2018, vol. 39, no. 7


figure 2. Frequency (%) of reported facilitators, arranged by System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) category.


the checklist standards. For instance, none of the participants noted barriers to cleansing the rubber hub of the vial prior to accessing, despite that element only being followed 86% of the time. The only standards explicitly mentioned in interview responses were the availability and correct use of safety devices and the availability of needleless devices for preparation of injectables. No pattern was noted between responses and type of clinic or between staff within clinics. Themes indirectly relating to checklist standards along with SEIPS categories are reported in Table 1 with the frequencies of adherence by clinic type.


Workflow


A wide variety of responses were recorded for the workflow category, reflecting the diversity of practice across participating clinics. In total, 72 different themes were assigned to 154 coded segments, 87 (55%) of which were described as barriers. The most frequently described barrier was the perception of feeling rushed and a high patient turnover (Figure 1). One participant commented that being in a hurry increases the risk for missing steps in the injection process. For reported facilitators, themes that included planning ahead for the injections emerged. Some technical aspects of injection administration were also noted to be facilitators (Figure 2).


Persons


Of the 202 segments coded to persons, 101 (50%) were described as barriers. The most frequently described barrier


theme was patient movement during the injection (Figure 1), such as jumping or attempting to swat the hands of the HCW. One participant described having to hold a child during an immunization due to concerns of the child jumping and causing a needlestick injury. In pediatric populations, HCWs reported this type of patient reaction most often. For facil- itators, a primary theme involved attempts to ameliorate a negative patient reaction. However, facilitators most fre- quently described were positive characteristics of staff giving the injection and available resources (Figure 2).


Environment


Of the 129 segments coded to environment, 51 (40%) were considered barriers to safe injection practice, including lack of space, smaller patient care areas, and limited storage supply space. Themost commonfacilitator reported by both staff and managers was having injection supplies near work areas. Other common themes characterized the room in which medications are prepared and the availability of adjustable equipment (Figure 2).


Organization


Of the 136 segments coded to organization, 67 (49%) were clas- sified as barriers. Most of the barrier themes involved inadequate staffing and training (Figure 1). Financial barriers were reported exclusively by managers. Managers were more likely than staff members to report annual skill competencies as helpful (Figure 2). One manager explained that regular competencies


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144