830 infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2018, vol. 39, no. 7
figure 2. Development results (January–March 2015). Shown are both the adjudicated classifications by ventilator-associated event (VAE) type, as well as a summary 2×2 table with the calculated sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values for both manual surveillance (MS) and automated surveillance (AS).
figure 3. Validation results (January–March 2016). Shown are both the adjudicated classifications by ventilator-associated event (VAE) type, as well as a summary 2×2 table with the calculated sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values for both manual surveillance (MS) and automated surveillance (AS).
An example of automated surveillance detection of an IVACcase is provided in Figure 4.
discussion
We found that completely automated surveillance, relying on physiologic data streamed live frombedsidemonitors, combined with clinical data available in the EHR, was superior to manual surveillance conducted by experienced IC practitioners.With the exception of a technical data lapse during the validation period when physiologic data were not available, automated surveil- lance performed with perfect sensitivity and specificity. Manual detection was subject to human error, including missed cases, misclassifications of detected cases, and false detections. The use of data visualization techniques to summarize results of the
automated process made interpreting and verifying findings during automated surveillance straightforward, which increased the efficiency of the surveillance process. Our findings are consistent with those of others who have reported on efforts to transition from manual to partially automated VAE surveillance, with some important differences. Stevens et al6 conducted a retrospective review of all admis- sions to any of 9 ICUs at a single hospital over a 6-year period. The algorithm extracted all data elements from the EHR, but the data used to identify mechanically ventilated patients as well as ventilator settings were based on manual entry to the EHR by respiratory therapists, a process that introduces the possibility of data entry error. Notably, “misapplication” refers to incorrect application of VAE definitions, rather than errors arising from missing data. The algorithm was sensitive
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144