modified reporting of urine culture 817
figure 1. Participant Flow. table 1. Patient Demographics Variable
Age, mean y ±SD Females, no. (%)
Urinary tract infection, no. (%)
Asymptomatic bacteriuria, no. (%)
Standard Reporting (n=55)
68.6±16.0 36/55 (64.5) 14/55 (25.4)
41/55 (74.5)
Modified Reporting (n=55)
67.7±16.3 35/55 (63.6) 20/55 (36.3)
35/55 (63.6)
Most inpatients received many courses of antibiotics for various reasons during admission, so this difference reflects a small proportion of total antibiotic cost. Total length of stay was 45.9 ± 44.6 days in the standard reporting arm, compared to 34.9 ± 46.7 days in the modified reporting arm (mean length of stay reduction = 11.0 days per episode (P = .22). Total length of stay in patients treated appropriately for UTI/ASB was 30.1 ± 41.5 days, compared to 59.6 ± 47.7 days in patients treated inappropriately for UTI/ ASB (mean length of stay reduction, 29.5 days per episode; P = .001).
in both arms. Most new symptoms were unrelated to urinary tract infection (Supplementary Table 4).
Cost
The mean cost of antibiotic treatment given for UTI/ASB was $35.78 ± $109.77 in the standard reporting arm (36 pre- scriptions given to 53 patients), compared to $19.84 ± 64.88 in the modified reporting arm (27 prescriptions given to 53 patients) (mean cost savings, $14.94 per episode; P = .37).
discussion
We have demonstrated that modified urine-culture reporting is associated with a significant reduction in inappropriate treatment, without an increase in adverse events. An increase in empiric UTI treatment was not observed. Other multi- faceted interventions significantly reduced treatment of ASB among inpatients7 and among catheterized patients8; however, these interventions require considerable ongoing effort3 compared to changing laboratory policy.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144