search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
870 infection control & hospital epidemiology july 2018, vol. 39, no. 7


was highlighted in a small report from Netherlands, in which 11 of 43 additional positives using xTAG GPP could not be confirmed, including 5 EH and 4 Salmonella cases.8 These results, coupled with those of our study, support the need for confirmatory testing in epidemiologically implausible circumstances. A large health-system analysis of GPP imple- mentation noted the large number of positive results of uncertain clinical significance as the main detraction to wide- scale implementation of these testing strategies, while others have identified GPP use in hospitalized patients as a potential diagnostic stewardship target.9,10 In summary, clusters of a single pathogen identified by


multiplex GPP diagnostic assay require investigation to confirm the likelihood of a true outbreak, especially in the absence of convincing epidemiologic data for exposure to the identified pathogen. Further evaluation of GPP diagnostic assays is necessary to document the true sensitivity and specificity of these multiplex assays in real-world clinical settings, especially among specialized patient populations.


acknowledgments


Financial support: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center supported this study (Core grant no. P30 CA008748). Potential conflicts of interest: Dr. Babady acknowledges grant support


from Luminex. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.


Affiliations: 1. Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Memorial


Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 2. Infection Control, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 3. Clinical Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 4. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Address correspondence to Elizabeth Robilotti, MD, MPH, 1275 York Avenue Box 9, New York, NY 10065 (robilote@mskcc.org).


Received January 24, 2018; accepted March 28, 2018; electronically published May 10, 2018 © 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2018/3907-0016. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.95


references


1. Cox GJ, Matsui SM, Lo RS, et al. Etiology and outcome of diar- rhea after marrow transplantation: a prospective study. Gastro- enterology 1994;107:1398–1407.


2. Halligan E, Edgeworth J, Bisnauthsing K, et al. Multiplex mole- cular testing for management of infectious gastroenteritis in a hospital setting: a comparative diagnostic and clinical utility study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:O460–O467.


3. Khare R, Espy MJ, Cebelinski E, et al. Comparative evaluation of two commercial multiplex panels for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens by use of clinical stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:3667–3673.


4. Laude A, Valot S, Desoubeaux G, et al. Is real-time PCR-based diagnosis similar in performance to routine parasitological examination for the identification of Giardia intestinalis, Cryp- tosporidium parvum/Cryptosporidium hominis and Entamoeba histolytica from stool samples? Evaluation of a new commercial multiplex PCR assay and literature review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016;22:e191–e198.


5. Navidad JF, Griswold DJ, Gradus MS, Bhattacharyya S. Evalua- tion of Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen analyte-specific reagents for high-throughput, simultaneous detection of bacteria, viruses, and parasites of clinical and public health importance. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:3018–3024.


6. Smith AM, Mthanti MA, Haumann C, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium primarily affecting a pediatric ward in South Africa in 2012. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:627–631.


7. Tan SH, Lawler J, Foster K, et al. Nosocomial transmission of Salmonella typhimurium in renal transplant recipients. J Hosp Infect 2010;75:241–242.


8. Wessels E, Rusman LG, van Bussel MJ, Claas EC. Added value of multiplex Luminex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (xTAG(R) GPP) testing in the diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:O182–O187.


9. Freeman K, Mistry H, Tsertsvadze A, et al. Multiplex tests to identify gastrointestinal bacteria, viruses and parasites in people with suspected infectious gastroenteritis: a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess 2017;21: 1–188.


10. Hitchcock MM, Gomez CA, Banaei N. Low yield of FilmArray GI panel in hospitalized patients with diarrhea: an opportunity for diagnostic stewardship intervention. J Clin Microbiol 2018;56 pii e01558–17; doi: 10.1128/JCM.01558-17.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144