search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
bacteremia during vv ecmo 873


table 2. Predictors of Bloodstream Infection During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Univariable Analysis


Characteristic Age


Immunocompromised state


Cannulation site for VV ECMO Femoro-jugular


Femoro-femoral veins


Mixed with arterial cannulation Broad-spectrum antibiotics


Corticosteroid Parenteral nutrition support OR


0.99 0.93


Reference 0.54 2.18 1.17 0.83 1.34


Total units of transfused red cell and platelet 1.01 Duration of arterial catheter, week Duration of CVC, week


1.22 1.24


population range widely, from 3.4% to 21.1%,1,4,9–16 Although the incidence of BSI in our study was similar to that reported previously, a recent study that included 100 adult patients treated with venovenous ECMO and who underwent routine blood cultures showed an incidence rate of 35%,5 which is relatively high compared to our study but might be associated with routine surveillance blood culture. Inconsistent with previous reports,1,5,6,9–11 a prolonged


duration of ECMO support was not associated with BSI in our study. However, the longer duration of ECMO might be the result of an adverse effect by BSI rather than a risk factor for BSI.6 In this study, patients with BSI had almost double duration of venovenous ECMO. Using the trends test, we found no significant change in BSI rate across the duration of venovenous ECMO. ECMO patients generally have multiple indwelling catheters including central vein catheters and radial arterial catheters, in addition to the cannulas used for the ECMO circuit. We found that the risk of BSI increased inde- pendently with the duration of arterial catheterization. Therefore, arterial catheters should be examined as a potential source of BSI in patients receiving venovenous ECMO support.17 In addition, a higher number of transfusions was independently associated with BSI. Although the association of blood transfusion with nosocomial infection in critically ill patients has been demonstrated previously,18 no study has specifically addressed the potential association of blood transfusion and BSI in patients receiving ECMO. Patients with prolonged ECMO support have a higher probability of being transfused.19 However, multicollinearity was not found in the regression model (variance inflation factor, 1.080). Gram-negative organisms such as A. baumannii, Steno-


trophomonas maltophilia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are common BSI pathogens.5,10,15 Consistent with data obtained in patients received venovenous ECMO,5,10,15 gram-negative bacteria accounted for 38% of BSI in this study. These results were likely related to the facts that cases suspected of con- tamination by common skin contaminants were not diagnosed


95% CI


0.96–1.03 0.33–2.64


0.15–2.02


.699 .896


0.19–25.42 .535 0.43–3.17 0.16–4.20 0.52–3.45 1.00–1.02 1.06–1.41 0.96–1.59


.818 .538 .008 .006 .104


.363 .751


Multivariable Analysis


P Value OR 95% CI 0.99 0.95–1.03


1.17 0.35–3.95 0.65 0.11–3.73


P Value .580


.803


2.04 0.15–28.00 .594 0.62 0.18–2.20 0.29 0.04–2.19 1.03 0.36–2.97 1.01 1.00–1.02 1.25 1.03–1.52 0.92 0.65–1.30


.228 .955 .025 .025 .639


NOTE. CVC, central venous cathether; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VV, venovenous.


Some studies have demonstrated significantly increased mor- tality rates in pediatric patients with BSI compared with patients without BSI,13 but other studies involving patients receiving venovenous ECMO showed that BSI had no effect on mortality.5,9 In this study, the ECMO-related outcomes, weaning rates, and duration of ECMO support were significantly worse in patients with BSI than in those without BSI. In addition, a trend toward higher mortality among patients with BSI was detected. Therefore, more effective infection control measures are warranted to reduce infections and to improve outcomes in patients receiving ECMO. In summary, the incidence of BSI during venovenous


as BSIs and that 81% of BSIs were secondary BSIs associated with pulmonary, intra-abdominal, or urinary tract infection. Pulmonary infection was most commonly associated with BSI in our study. Schmidt et al1 also demonstrated that ventilator- associated pneumonia was the most common source of BSI and that P. aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated organism from blood culture in adult cardiogenic shock patients with venoarterial ECMO. The impact of BSI on clinical outcomes is controversial.1


ECMO support was as high as 17% in adult patients with severe acute respiratory failure. Longer duration of arterial catheterization and more blood transfusions were indepen- dently associated with BSI, which was associated with poor clinical outcomes.


acknowledgments


Financial support: This work was supported by Samsung Medical Center (grant no. OTX0002901). Potential conflicts of interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest


relevant to this article. Affiliations: 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical


Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2. Intensive Care Unit Nursing Department, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of


.633 .463


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144