Special Report


WRITTEN BY CLAUDIA NEWTON | CLAUDIA@STNONLINE.COM Y


ou’ve probably heard the saying, “Failing to plan is planning to fail.” Tat has applications not only when deciding on a new school bus fuel, but also when con- sidering opportunities like the $2.925 billion available


in the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund Settle- ment that rewards clean fuel choices. Tere’s no denying that the Volkswagen funding presents “such


a great opportunity for school buses right now,” declared Bri- anna Lawrence, senior associate with grant consultant Gladstein, Neandross & Associates, during a panel on school bus emissions reduction funding at the STN EXPO in July. As of mid August, she explained, 40 states had released draft


plans for what they propose to do with their share of the VW funds, with nearly 75 percent of those states dedicating 25 percent or more to school buses. By this fall, some states will begin receiving part of their funding, which could take up to 10 years to disburse. Every state is different in how it is handling the distribution of


its VW funding, confirmed Joe Annotti, GNA’s vice president of programs, during an April 2018 STN webinar. Although one of the U.S. EPA’s specifications for funding is that all-electric school buses may receive more funding than for new diesel or alternative fuels, different alt-fuels have better chances in some states than in others. For example, the money allotted to California and New York


is planned to focus on electric school buses for disadvantaged or low-income environmental justice communities, defined by EPA as “disproportionately burdened by environmental harms and risks.” Illinois set aside up to 10 percent of its share, about $11 million, to replace diesel school buses with electric vehicles. Arkansas is dedicating 54 percent of its $14.6 million to CNG school buses, while Delaware is using over $3.2 million for its Propane School Bus Replacement Project. Other states are focusing on replacing buses rather than on spe- cific fuels. Arizona is providing up to $38 million to replace diesel school buses in low-income communities. Oregon is replacing over 450 model-year 2006 and 2007 diesel school buses with clean diesel, CNG, gasoline or propane. Maine is funding up to 80 percent of new purchases or rerofit proj-


ects, as long as they are electric or another alternative fuel. Missouri is using $12 to $18 million to replace aging school bus fleets. All of this money on the table is forcing school districts and their transportation departments to consider alternative fuels, if


18 School Transportation News • SEPTEMBER 2018


they haven’t before. Fortunately, districts have options and support as they consider whether to switch to an alternative clean fuel, and address related infrastructure and fuel supply concerns, or opt for a plug-and-play fuel that can easily replace traditional diesel. Propane is already on its way to becoming a staple in the school bus industry, according to the Propane Education & Research Council, which reported that new vehicle registrations were up by over 700 percent over the last five years. ROUSH CleanTech Pres- ident Todd Mouw predicted in June that propane would become the “lead horse” for school bus fuel over the next decade, with natural gas coming in second and electric quickly rising in use. CNG adoption remains strong, with over 5,500 such school buses in


use throughout the U.S., according to Natural Gas Vehicles for America. Currently there are fewer than 200 electric school buses on


the road, provided by Te Lion Electric Co., Starcraft and Trans Tech. Blue Bird began taking orders for its Type C and D electrics in April. Tomas Built Buses introduced its concept “Jouley” last October, while the IC Bus concept “chargE” is on tour. Meritor CEO Jay Craig said at the Advanced Clean Transpor-


tation Expo earlier this year that the company’s internal research indicated that up to 60 percent of newly manufactured school buses could be electrified by 2025, though other estimates say it could be half that number. Commercial vehicle analyst ACT Research Co. (unaffiliated with the ACT Expo) predicted that up to four percent of all school buses produced in 2019 could be electric. Meanwhile, IC Bus introduced a gasoline school bus last June, although that market has been dominated by Blue Bird, which delivered its 2,500th gasoline-powered Vision in April. Biodiesel and renewable diesel are also rising in popularity, although distribution remains a challenge that is faced by student transporters looking to use either of these. Another notable fact is that the VW Settlement offers student


transporters benefits beyond monetary savings and a cleaner en- vironment. An STN survey administered in July 2018 found that one-fourth of the respondents planning to use VW monies for new school buses also planned to add extra safety equipment or tech- nology on those buses, such as fire suppression or seat belts. 


Visit stnonline.com/go/altfuel to read more about the fuel choices that school districts are making, as well as how they are handling funding, infrastructure and implementation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52