This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
medical wellness


preventative healthcare


A groundbreaking programme that aims to prevent the onset of diabetes is being rolled out across the US. Kate Cracknell reports


“I


n the late 1990s, the US federal government invested about US$200m to study whether a drug or a lifestyle


intervention would be more effective in preventing diabetes,” says Jonathan Lever, vice president for health strategy and innovation at YMCA of the US.


“Led by the National Institutes of Health, that study was known as the landmark Diabetes Prevention Programme trial and it ran for seven years, enrolling close to 4,000 people and with a research network comprising 27 different centres across the US. “The study was shut down early


because the lifestyle intervention was clearly so much more effective than the drug. It wouldn’t have been ethical to have continued.” Lever adds: “In that study, the


lifestyle intervention was delivered on a


one-to-one basis, with the researchers authorised to give each patient virtually anything they needed to help them change their lifestyle, whether that was a pair of gym shoes or access to a nutritionist. Because the goal wasn’t to see if this was an effi cient way to do it – it was just to see whether lifestyle was more effective than a drug. “When the results were published in


The New England Journal of Medicine in 2002, it generated a lot of interest, but the problem was that this particular intervention was extremely cost- ineffective – it cost around US$1,400 per person and was simply not scaleable. “One of the original researchers – a


professor at Indiana University School of Medicine – felt that there must be a better way to do it, so in 2005 he approached the YMCA of Greater Indianapolis with a view to doing


about the diabetes prevention programme


overweight and inactive, high blood pressure, family history, and age (‘at risk’ individuals are generally aged 45 years and over). The programme consists of 16 hour-long sessions delivered within


“T


a maximum of 24 weeks, followed by monthly maintenance meetings. Sessions are led by a trained lifestyle coach who facilitates a small group of people (maximum 15 people). The group discusses topics such as healthy eating, with a particular


focus on cutting fat intake. It also looks at increasing physical activity, reducing stress, problem solving and behaviour change strategies in general, coaching people through the barriers that prevent them from making positive lifestyle changes. The ultimate goal for all participants is to lose between 5 and 7 per


cent body weight, as well as gradually increasing physical activity levels to 150 minutes a week. “But there’s a lot of scope to customise within those set goals, working with individuals to determine the exact things they will do to achieve them,” explains Dr Ann Albright of the CDC. “The secret is helping people fi gure out how they’re going to change


their own behaviour, assisted by encouragement from the group,” says the YMCA’s Jonathan Lever. “People generally know what’s good and bad for them – they just don’t know how to make the necessary adjustments.”


54 Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital


The diabetes prevention programme looks at increasing activity and changing behaviour


april 2012 © cybertrek 2012


he diabetes prevention programme is a 12-month, group-based programme targeting those at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes. Risk factors include being


essentially the same thing, but in a group-based format. He wanted to see if the same results could be achieved as in the national, one-to-one trial – a minimum fi ve per cent weight loss. “Long story short, the professor’s


group achieved an average six per cent weight loss, in a programme that was delivered at a quarter of the price of the original intervention.”


towards a national programme Lever continues: “It was at this point that the CDC (the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) approached the YMCA at a national level. They had been involved in the initial national study, and they wanted to see if our Indianapolis results could be replicated in another centre. They gave us the funding to do that and we achieved similar results in the YMCA of


ALL PICS: WWW.SHUTTERSTOCK.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84