This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
18 | REFURBISHMENT FOCUS | CAMPUS SERVICES


COMBINING THE OLD WITH THE NEW


Refurbishing ancient university buildings brings a number of challenges. University Business talked to leading UK property consultancy Bidwells about university renovation projects and what is involved.


Many university buildings are listed and/or located in conservation areas. There are often different stakeholders involved, all with their own expectations and there’s a need to create a building that will last for a long time to come. That’s in addition to the usual project challenges of completing on time and on budget.


Jesus College, Cambridge


Jesus College wanted to refurbish its Chapel Court on-site student accommodation. The £11m project involved the renovation


and insertion of en suite bathrooms within the historic Chapel Court, one of the largest collegiate courts in Cambridge and with staircases on the Grade II Listed north-east wings dating back to 1884 and 1927. In addition to increasing the number


of letable student rooms from 87 to 121, the design team also needed to make the historic complex more efficient


and sustainable by rationalising the accommodation and increasing thermal performance and service provision. However with a Grade II Listed building,


creating a specific sustainable agenda for the long-term posed some challenges. Introducing insulation and secondary glazing were particularly complex because of the listed status. Nicholas Petit, Head of Project


Management at Bidwells, said: “In addition to


“The team spent a great deal of time finding the right balance between the cost of installing new technology and managing lifecycle costs”


the usual challenges of refurbishing historical and listed buildings, we needed to achieve our sustainability objectives. The team spent a great deal of time finding the right balance between the cost of installing new technology such as ground source heat pumps and photovoltaic panels and managing lifecycle costs. This involved looking at capital expenditure versus long-term savings. “As ever with buildings of this age


and status, we had to work closely with our local Planning Conservation Officer and also the representative from English Heritage to ensure that any changes we were recommending were sympathetic and there was no loss of historic fabric.”


All imagery courtesy of Bidwells


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82