This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Submersible patroller is seakindly and stable PATROL VESSELS


Center (NSWC) explained at a recent conference, recent gains in hullform design have enhanced the seakeeping ability of small types of combatants such as patrol boats. Exploiting these gains, the NSWC and Naval


A


Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) have been working together with shipbuilder Oregon Iron Works on the design and construction of a 71ft Technology Demonstrator, designed to be more seakindly and stable than earlier craft – and have the added advantage of being submersible. The craft is known as Sealion. Sealion was designed to have improved


seakeeping characteristics and reduced hull motions in a seaway, compared with other US Navy vessels, which, the NSWC and NAVSEA anticipate, will result in reduced fatigue and injury experienced by personnel during training and operations. The Sealion Technology Demonstrator was


delivered for evaluation in January 2003 and is currently the subject of what the US Navy describes as ‘operational experimentation.’ Apart from offering a particularly stable design


with good seakeeping for maximum logistical flexibility – it can be carried onboard C-17 and C-5 aircraft and on conventional Maritime Sealift Command and US Navy vessels. Sealion will help the US Navy with a range


of technologies for advanced high-speed craft, including hullforms, structural design and construction, propulsion, systems design, electronics, and Human System Integration (HSI), plus areas such as mission integration and modular reconfiguration. As Ms Grimsley Speirs explained, the need


for advanced technology craft in the US Navy is expanding. Current generation craft are expected to perform a range of missions, such as maritime interdiction operations (MIO), border protection, and personnel transport for anti-terrorism and force protection, but the shortcomings of these platforms are becoming apparent. Existing craft and new ones are required to


maintain high speeds in heavy seaways with no injury or degradation of the performance of personnel and without damage to the craft, its equipment, or its payload. ‘The reality is that current craft are injuring crew members at a rate nearly six times that of the overall US Navy average,’ Ms Grimsley Speirs explained, ‘and


S Jenny Grimsley Speirs of the Carderock Division of the Naval Surface Warfare


The Sealion concept is intended as a seakindly, stable semi-submersible craft.


the craft are suffering increased maintenance costs due to operations at speeds and acceleration levels beyond the craft design.’ The missions that patrol boats and small


craft are required to carry out are becoming more complex and require the gathering and transmission of much greater amounts of information, which places heavy demands on existing craft for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) equipment. Another important requirement is the ability to rapidly reconfigure a vessel to suit a range of missions. ‘The requirement to process increased


amounts of information for use by the crew and the extended duration of many of the missions require designers to ensure that human systems interface issues are being addressed, and, finally, the need to maintain presence in the battle space (either at home or abroad) often entails the craft getting to theatre quickly and operating undetected, requiring the designer to address and resolve issues related to craft signatures,’ explained Ms Grimsley Speirs. Recognising shortcomings in existing patrol


craft, the US Navy identified the need to focus on a number of key areas. These are:


TECHNICAL PARTICULARS SEALION


Length, oa ......................................... 71ft Beam .............................................. 14.3ft Displacement ................................... 30LT Speed ....................... - in excess 40knots Range ......................................... 300+nm Payload ......................................... 5000lb Minimum draft ................................... 3.4ft Maximum draft .................................. 4.7ft


46


• Hullform. • Structural design and construction. • Propulsion and systems design. • Electronics and weapons integration. • Human systems integration. • Mission needs integration. • Modular reconfiguration.


At about the same time that the US Navy


began working on Sealion, it came to the project team’s notice than another navy was also


Sealion was designed to have improved seakeeping characteristics and reduced hull motions in a seaway, compared with other US Navy vessels.


investigating technology areas to meet similar craft requirements, and that a 65ft technology demonstrator craft, known as Alligator, was under construction at Oregon Iron Works. With a length overall of 65ft and beam of


13.4ft, this craft was intended as a high-speed, semi-submersible combatant with improved seakeeping characteristics. It was to have a displacement of 23tonnes, speed of 40knots, range of 500nm and maximum draft of 4.55ft. A team from the NSWC conducted trials on


Alligator craft prior to its delivery and met with the vessel’s engineers and operators to discuss the design of the craft and lessons learned. Based on the capabilities demonstrated by the vessel during tests, and feedback received during the visit, the US also decided to explore the concept of a semi-submersible hullform with good seakeeping characteristics, but with modifications to suit US requirements.


WARSHIP TECHNOLOGY MAY 2007


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68