search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
// MLL Preview BY THE NUMBERS Seven statistical trends to watch in 2016 45


OFFENSIVE RATING


measures the number of points a team would score over 45 possessions. Ohio led MLL with a 14.14 rating.


Marcus Holman


5%


2-POINT PERCENTAGE


Attackmen converted just 5.0 percent from beyond the arc.


Kyle Denhoff


OFFENSIVE RATING THE BEST OFFENSE MIGHT NOT BE


WHO YOU THINK


Traditional goals scored and allowed statistics are polluted by variations in pace and possession percentage. Evaluating offensive and defensive units on a per-possession basis fi lters out those toxins, and provides a more realistic metric. Offensive rating measures the number of points a team would score over 45 possessions — an


30 LACROSSE MAGAZINE »April 2016 A Publication of US Lacrosse 49 & 48


FAST-BREAK GOALS


The Cannons and Lizards gener ated the most goals on fast breaks (49 and 48, respectively); they also allowed the fewest goals on fast breaks (29 and 27, respectively).


UNASSISTED GOALS PERCENTAGE


PLAYERS 2


Only two players — Lyle Thompson and Davey Emala — shot better when unassisted than Rochester midfi elder Kyle Denhoff (42.9 percent).


USAGE RATE 8.6


There is a reason why Ned Crotty’s stint in New York was less successful than Paul Rabil’s. Rob Pannell (8.6) and Rabil (7.2) were two of 10 players in MLL to use more than seven possessions per game, serving as the Lizards’ south and north poles.


15.8


ASSIST OPPORTUNITIES


Pannell and Rabil combined for nearly 16 assist opportunities per game in 2015.


BY JOE KEEGAN


©LEE WEISSMAN (MH); ©JOHN STROHSACKER (KD)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68