search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Annual Report and Accounts 2016 Our Governance model is different


The Partnership operates under a written Constitution. The Constitution provides the Principles and Rules within which we aim to demonstrate, through Partners, customers and profit, that we are a better form of business.


John Lewis Partnership plc


75


Our Governance model is different


The Partnership was one of the first UK businesses to have a written constitution establishing its governance structure. This was well before the advent of modern standards of corporate governance and the development of the framework of legislation, regulation and best practice standards in place today, including the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code). In this section we explain how our governance structure is different to companies subject to the Code.


The Founder of the Partnership, John Spedan Lewis, recognised that it was essential to safeguard the values which had motivated him to sign away his personal ownership rights in a growing retail company to allow future generations of employees to take forward his vision of ‘industrial democracy’. Therefore he wanted to leave some clear guidelines for his successors, which were enshrined in the Trust settlements and Constitution.


The Partnership’s governance structure has seen the business flourish since 1928, through periods of economic recession and uncertainty, numerous world events, changes of government and seismic changes in customer behaviour and selling channels.


Throughout this time, the Principles of the Constitution have endured and generations of Partners have shared in the rewards of success. The challenge for Partners of today is to prove that a business which is not driven by the demands of outside shareholders and which sets high standards of behaviour can flourish in competitive conditions. The Partnership aims to demonstrate that adhering to the Constitution’s Principles and Rules enables us over the long-term to outperform companies with conventional ownership structures.


The Code was not written with co-owned businesses in mind. It was developed to protect shareholders of quoted companies as a guide to effective board practice and is based on the underlying principles of good governance: accountability, transparency, probity and focus on the sustainable success of an entity over the longer term.


Although the Partnership is exempt from compliance with the Code as it has no tradable equity capital listed on the London Stock Exchange, the Partnership Board has voluntarily adopted the Code on a comply or explain basis. The Code recognises that alternative governance arrangements may be justified, if good governance can be achieved by other means. As the Partnership’s Constitution and co-ownership model established its own unique governance structure, there are certain areas where the Partnership’s governance arrangements are distinctly different and do not comply with the Code.


The Code


The Code, published by the Financial Reporting Council, is available to view at www.frc.org.uk. The Code was last updated in September 2014. Reporting on the revised Code provisions is included in this Annual Report and Accounts on page 99 in relation to Going Concern, page 54 in relation to an assessment of the principal risks facing the Company, page 99 for an assessment of the long-term viability of the Company, and pages 52 to 54 for details of how the Partnership Board monitors the Company’s risk management and internal control systems.


While being different, the Partnership’s governance model is broadly consistent with each of the Code’s Principles and offers the appropriate level of protection to Partners and other stakeholders. The Partnership acknowledges these differences as being part of the governance model that works for this business and has done so since 1928.


The main areas of difference are:


We do not have a separate Chairman and Chief Executive Page 76 >


We do not have a Senior Independent Director Page 76 >


A majority of the Partnership Board are not Non-Executive Directors Page 76 >


Our Directors do not retire by rotation Page 76 >


Our Board Committees are different Page 77 >


It’s Your Voice


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168