search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Main areas of evaluation 1. Functionality 2. 3.


Functionality


The functional support was linked to a wide range of both current and future requirements, with the latter including Islamic banking, internet banking and MIS reporting.


Technical Architecture


The technical architecture analysis included scalability, systems architecture, interface capabilities and data migration.


Vendor Strength


The vendor evaluation included experience, implementation, project management track-record, financial strength, and commitment to its product, help desk facilities, documentation and support capabilities in the region. Each factor within the three areas was given its own weighting. ‘It was a very independent, auditable exercise,’ he said.


There were also reference site visits. The three systems that ended up on the shortlist were Flexcube from Oracle FSS, Harland-derived Phoenix via Kuwait-based International Turnkey Systems (ITS), and Polaris’ Intellect suite. Oracle FSS scored 86 points out of 100, ITS scored 63 and Polaris 58.


‘It was not that difficult a choice,’ pointed out Dickens. The selection ended in October 2003 and contracts were finalized in December that year.


Implementation


The same consulting firm was used on the implementation, with this kicking off a couple of months later. Using Cedar provided continuity, so that it was a fairly smooth transition from selection to implementation. It meant that, having helped to choose the system, the same consultancy then had to deliver, so there was no walking away, said Dickens. ‘It worked really well.’ In addition, using a third party to do


40


Technical Architecture Vendor Strength


the administration around the project freed up Dickens to address any issues that arose and ensure that these were dealt with quickly. By being able to concentrate on the big issues and not become embroiled in the minutiae of the project, he was able to drive all the steering committees and was able to make aggressive and bold decisions where necessary, or was able to escalate issues to the appropriate business heads and ensure a swift response from them. The money on the consultancy firm was well spent and not excessive, said Dickens.


However, a bank should not give a third party ‘carte blanche’. From the bank, there was a dedicated team of users from all business areas and a dedicated IT team, accounting for around 25 to 30 staff. Oracle FSS/I-flex was also part of the project team from the outset. It provided resources on- site until after the cut-over, including a permanent project manager and ‘shell team’ of five or six staff which was augmented depending on the project stage. The business owners had to sign off their parts of the project. One major task that kicked off at the start of the project and continued throughout was data cleansing.


Challenges


Moving from an archaic account-based system to a modular customer information file-based replacement was clearly not a case of replacing like-for-like. ‘There was an awful lot of data scrubbing. The quality of the data was pretty ropey and there was a lot missing.’ There was a need to identify duplicate customer records across the branches and this could only be done through manual scanning. There was then a need to add to the data, to fill in the many gaps, with this deemed to be essential as the bank moved to improve its customer relationship management (CRM). Another complication was staff training.


Testing & Training


Clearly, the bank was adapting to the system, not the other way around. ‘We made a very conscious effort to keep customization to an absolute minimum,’ said Dickens. The vendor was already working with many other more sophisticated banks around the world, ‘so how could a little bank in Abu Dhabi be any different?’ The vanilla products within the new system were ‘already a huge leap forward for us’. Thus, the focus was on implementing well what was there rather than becoming side-tracked by small improvements and changes. It was much better to use that precious time to concentrate on User Acceptance Testing (UAT) and simulations, concluded Dickens.


Islamic Report www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266