MODERNISING THE DESIGN PATENT SYSTEM JURISDICTION REPORT: RUSSIA
Irmeli Nokkanen Papula-Nevinpat
In Russia, design protection has been based on a combination of pictures and written claims. Te scope of protection conferred by a design patent has been determined by the sum of the essential features as shown in the pictures of the design and listed in the claimed essential features filed by the applicant and accepted by Rospatent. In October 2014, the design protection system changed radically in
Russia with changes to part IV of the Civil Code coming into force. A list of claimed essential features for design patent filings is no longer required, and the scope of protection is determined only on the basis of the pictures enclosed with the application. Tis change modernises the Russian design protection system and
brings it closer to Western systems. One aim behind this change was to make the Russian design protection system compatible with the Hague System. Te US and Japan joined it this year, and it is estimated that Russia will join it within the next couple of years. Te accession of the US and Japan is expected to boost further expansion of the Hague System. For those interested in design protection in Russia, the national
change means clear advantages: fewer requirements, and an easier and more cost-effective process. Russian patent attorneys have draſted lists of claimed essential features for applicants according to the requirements of the Russian legislation, and this has been time-consuming and meant additional costs for the applicants if compared to design protection in other countries. For many applicants, it has also been difficult to understand why the
list of claimed essential features is critical to the application when they have been accustomed to design protection normally being based only on pictures. For non-Russian speakers, it has also been difficult to check what actually has been protected in Russia because this cannot be known without reading the accepted list of claimed essential features written in the Russian language. Because a list of claimed essential features is no longer required, it
means no voluntary amendments by the applicants to Rospatent and fewer office actions from Rospatent to the applicants, as most of them have related to amending the lists of claimed essential features in view of novelty and originality. Tis should mean granting decisions in a shorter time than at the moment—it currently takes about one year to get a design patent in Russia. A substantial examination is still conducted, so the near future will
tell what kind of examination practice Rospatent will adopt, and for example, whether the number of final rejection decisions will increase, because it will be probably more difficult to argue against the examiner’s objection. Until now, Rospatent has given final rejection decisions very rarely. If prior art has been found, the applicant has been able to limit the
84 World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2015
scope of protection by amending the list of claimed essential features and has been able to avoid rejection. It is an easier, faster and more economical process, but will it increase
the number of design filings in Russia? I assume it will. For example, foreign companies are more accustomed to design protection based only on pictures, and an easier and more economical process is always more attractive than a complicated one. Moreover, the Russian market, with more than 140 million people, is important for global companies. According to Rospatent’s statistics, the number of design patent
applications filed in Russia each year from 2003 to 2013 has varied between 3,104 and 4,994; no more recent statistics are available at the moment. If you compare these numbers with those of Community design filings, they are very modest. For example, in 2013 the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market received 23,194 Community design applications. Te Community design and its easy, fast and cost-effective process
covering a market area of more than 500 million people has been a real success story in the IP world. I do not believe that the modernised Russian design patent system will become as popular, but I am sure that it will be more popular than it has been.
Irmeli Nokkanen is a European design attorney at Papula-Nevinpat. She can be contacted at:
irmeli.nokkanen@
papula-nevinpat.com
www.worldipreview.com
“FOREIGN COMPANIES ARE MORE ACCUSTOMED TO DESIGN PROTECTION BASED ONLY ON PICTURES, AND AN EASIER AND MORE ECONOMICAL PROCESS IS ALWAYS MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN A COMPLICATED ONE.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100