This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ONLINE IP FILINGS NOW AVAILABLE JURISDICTION REPORT: ITALY


Julia Holden and Lorenzo Battarino Trevisan & Cuonzo


On February 2, 2015, the Italian Patent and Trademark Office (UIBM) opened a new chapter in its history by finally introducing a system that allows any applicant, whether an individual, registered company or a patent/trademark attorney, to file applications for new patents, trademarks, or industrial designs online. With the new system, applications, requests for trademark renewals,


and translations of European patents can now be filed through a special section of the UIBM website. To access the service users require a registered email address as well as an electronic signature. Registration is, however, straightforward and can be carried out by following the simple instructions on the office’s portal. Even the payment of fees relating to registration, filing and renewal


of intellectual property rights has been streamlined: the amounts will now be calculated automatically during the filing process and can be paid directly through an online banking system, replacing the traditional payment by postal order. In addition, the system promises a real-time updating of databases on industrial property. Te more traditional form of paper filing with the office or with


different Italian offices such as the Italian Chamber of Commerce is still available. Te new system implemented by the UIBM mirrors the online filing


systems existing in many countries and already available at the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market for filing new trademarks and opposition proceedings, and at the European Patent Office (EPO) for filing European patent, Euro-PCT and Patent Cooperation Treaty applications, submissions in oppositions, appeals, limitations and revocation proceedings, and all related documents. Te reform is part of a larger effort undertaken by Italian authorities


in the last few years to improve the efficiency of public services and reduce bureaucracy with a view to attract ever more investments in the country by foreign businesses. Tis effort recently led, for example, to the introduction of the electronic filing of all court motions, pleadings and related documents in civil and commercial litigation. Tis new system, despite its being a recent innovation and therefore still needing to be fine-tuned, has already helped litigating parties to streamline the filing process, assisted the court offices to manage all case files more easily without having to deal with unwieldy paper files, as in the past, and helped judges to keep track of all documents and briefs filed in a case. Likewise, the new system for online IP filings is undoubtedly a


step forward for simplifying the procedure for the applicant and, it is hoped, for efficiency at the office, which must manage a high number of applications that need to be processed. Streamlining bureaucracy related to the filing of applications for


80 World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2015


industrial property rights should not, however, mislead those who want to protect an idea or a brand in their business activities. Te scope of protection conferred by the title, once granted, depends


on how the application was completed. Te filing of an application for an IP right (a patent, trademark or a registered model, etc) particularly requires skill and expertise in identifying how best to protect the strengths of the invention, the innovative aspects of a design or the features (wording and logo, etc) of a trademark. Tis positive development in the administrative efficiency of


application procedure for patent, trademark and industrial design applications should not therefore be seen as a new ‘DIY opportunity’ for private individuals and companies to register and file their IP rights. Protecting IP is oſten complex and the support of skilled professionals


is strongly advisable, especially to prevent inexperienced users from encountering difficulties later down the road when protecting and enforcing IP in the long term. Tis streamlining of applications is, however, a positive step for the UIBM and will be welcomed by the entire Italian IP community.


Julia Holden is partner at Trevisan & Cuonzo. She can be contacted at: jholden@trevisancuonzo.com Lorenzo Battarino is a trainee at Trevisan & Cuonzo. He can be contacted at: lbattarino@trevisancuonzo.com


www.worldipreview.com


“PROTECTING IP IS OFTEN COMPLEX AND THE SUPPORT OF SKILLED PROFESSIONALS IS STRONGLY ADVISABLE, ESPECIALLY TO PREVENT INEXPERIENCED USERS FROM ENCOUNTERING DIFFICULTIES LATER DOWN THE ROAD.”


the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100