This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BRAND PROFILE: STARBUCKS


since we opened in India than I think we’ve ever had before, as well as in Vietnam … and we see some issues in Cambodia. Before, there wasn’t that much awareness. “In China the primary form of infringement


is the use of our Chinese name on a wide variety of store fronts. Also, online sales of infringing products probably are a big issue in China,” she adds. Oktay says: “Outside the US it is mostly


cafés and restaurants that use a similar logo to Starbucks. We


also fi nd Frappuccino (a


trademark registered by Starbucks with the US Patent and Trademark Offi ce in 2005 to cover the drink) all over the place.” But they are fi nding that things are improving


and that protecting Starbucks’s trademarks is getting easier in some areas. Oktay says: “Depending on how sophisticated


the court system and the trademark offi ce is in that country, and how much the Starbucks brand is well known within that market, it becomes easier to protect our brand, especially since we have many stores and our brands are well recognised. “In some of those markets, I think it is improving overall,” he adds.


Beyond trademarks It is not just trademark rights that occupy Starbucks’s IP legal team. A sizeable patent portfolio covering its mobile payment methods, which Oktay claims is the “largest mobile payment system in the US”, has meant the company has been on the receiving end of lawsuits from non-practising entities, otherwise known as ‘patent trolls’. “We did see a lot of patent litigation by patent


trolls in the last few years. It diminished in the last year. T e Alice case changed the patent landscape and ever since that decision we’ve seen a drop in those patent lawsuits,” he adds. Unlike


its well-established logo, the


packaging design of certain Starbucks products is constantly


changing, meaning the legal


team has to keep up to date with its marketing department. Teraberry says: “We have a marketing review


group and they take the initial look at packaging design, for things other than trademarks. Some stores change their design every six weeks, so it’s constantly fl ying through and the main concern is that we make sure we have the rights to use whatever we use. Our group would handle any infringement reports.”


T e sheer size of Starbucks means it is always


attracting ire and aff ection from millions of consumers across the world. On the surface, Fielder’s Dumb Starbucks looked provocative but there was an insistence from him that it was not “affi liated in any way with Starbucks” and that, “in fact, we love Starbucks and look up to them as role models”. But attempts to create parodies can make


it difficult for Starbucks to decide whether to take action against alleged infringement. If Starbucks had chosen to target Fielder then it may have


resulted in bullying


accusations—a big brand unfairly tackling an


individual or small company. And


this problem could multiply as Starbucks continues its march into new territories across the world. Its global IP team, however, is prepared


for more diffi culties, and its experience with such situations should ensure it survives any disputes with its image intact. T e Dumb Starbucks episode had the potential to drag Starbucks into a public relations trap, but its IP team’s carefulness ensured that when the saga went up like a fi rework, it did not go off with a bang. 


www.worldipreview.com


World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2015


39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100