Managing Editor James Parker

Advertisement Manager/ Joint Publisher Anthony Parker

Production Assistants Mikey Pooley Shelley Collyer Rob Duncan Kim Musson

Editorial Assistants Roseanne Field Jack Wooler Teodora Lyubomirova

Editorial Coordinator Sue Benson

Contributors Norman Hayden Steve Menary

Sales Executives Suzanne Easter Ian Fletcher Kim Friend Steve Smith

Audience Development Manager Jane Spice

Managing Director Simon Reed

netMAG media

publishing – ver tical search

netMAGmedia Ltd Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfield East Sussex, TN21 8DF

Advertising & Administration t 01435 863500 f 01435 863897

Press Releases

Circulation enquiries



t may have been a battleground since time immemorial, but recently the territory between architects and ‘heritage’ groups has seen some fierce exchanges. Added to this however have been unusually heated words directed by architects against their peers.

Never one to shy away from trouble, Patrik Schumacher of ZHA was reported as saying that One World Trade Center in New York was “sterile, bland and a piece that’s nothing,” to gasps from the audience at a real estate summit in the city. And this was in the presence of Roger Duffy, design partner at the firm behind the project, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. It’s important to tackle conflict and not always drive for consensus at all costs, but this is surely fairly unusual even in the sometimes fearless world of star architectural practices.

Architects might not get the chance to pass judgement on Renzo Piano’s Paddington Cube scheme however, after the massive but transparent £775m scheme for Shard developer Seller Property Group has been stopped by Communities Secretary Sajid Javid. He has issued an Article 31 notice which buys time for the Department for Communities and Local Government to consider whether the scheme needs to officially be called in for review.

Objectors such as the Save Britain’s Heritage campaign are suggesting that the unusual issuing of such a notice suggests the Government’s concern over the scheme, leading it to take a detailed approach, although it was granted outline consent in December. The pressure group has described the building as “gratuitously overscaled” and a “violation” of Brunel’s nearby Grade 1 listed train station.

However at the slightly less headline-grabbing end of the scale, still-controversial schemes are making their way through the obstacles. AHMM’s proposals to redevelop a collection of shops and industrial buildings on a 5,400 m2

Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved

No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafile, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of- Custody certified supplier operating within environmental systems certified to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England

site on Gray’s Inn Road, London necessitate major demolition of

existing buildings (save their facades), to create one new seven-storey building. However the council persevered with the scheme despite passionate complaints from Historic England. Sometimes sensitively creating something that appears incongruous can, in contrasting with what is already there, enhance it fundamentally.

Opinions, at least those backed up by experience, are important and worthwhile, and we are keen to give ‘airtime’ to those of architects wherever possible in ADF. The voxpop featuring the wide-ranging concerns around Brexit from several key practices on page 18 is one example, and I encourage you to read it.

James Parker Editor


Beijing Zaha’s 46-storey tower with the world’s tallest atrium takes shape, page 5

Leeza SOHO tower

JW MARRIOTT VENICE RESORT + SPA Matteo Thun & Partners’ sensitive resort island masterplan brings out the best in old buildings


An innovative triangular design by Stride Treglown for teaching STEM subjects



The construction of the 46-storey, 207 metre Leeza SOHO mixed-use tower in Beijing by ZHA Architects has now reached level 20. The practice’s new renders reveal what the world’s tallest atrium yet is likely to look like. For more information, see facing page.



Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84