This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
COUNTY NEWS


Improving South County Mobility


by OC Supervisor Lisa Bartlett, 5th District O


n December 10, 2013, the Orange County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted to authorize execution of the construction contract for the La Pata Avenue Extension Project. This $126.5 million project will provide a critical link between the communities of San


Juan Capistrano and San Clemente. Commuters traveling this route should expect a 20 to 30 minute reduction in their travel time after all improvements are completed. This project provides distinct benefits to South County residents, including: • Improved public safety – Redundancy to I-5 freeway for emergency vehicles • Enhanced air quality – Reduction of congestion • Enriched economy – Faster transport of goods and services, north-south connector The La Pata Avenue Extension Project is the most significant County roadway improvement remaining in South County.


CONSTRUCTION UPDATE There are three phases to this project:


• Gap connector (currently underway) • Widening of the existing La Pata stretch from Ortega to just south of Vista Montana • Extension of Camino Del Rio The project celebrated its one-year construction anniversary in April 2015. The first phase of


the project, the gap connector, is 75% complete and on schedule to be completed in fall 2016. The remaining two phases are scheduled to begin in spring 2016. The project reached a major milestone this past August: the completion of the excavation and relocation of approximately 800,000 cubic yards of refuse within Prima Deshecha Landfill. In the next few months, earthwork and the bridge at the Prima Deshecha Landfill entrance will be completed. The County and construction crews have been working diligently to enhance connectivity for our South County communities.


San Clemente Mayor Chris Hamm, Orange County Supervisor Lisa Bartlett, and Former Mayor Wayne Eggleston at the installation of a new plaque at Park Semper Fi honoring the four Marines who died on May 12th from the HMLA 469, Veterans Day 2015.


COLLABORATIVE EFFORT Due to the uniqueness of this project and number of invested stakeholders, it is fully financed


via a combination of funding sources from Rancho Mission Viejo, Communities Facilities Districts (CFDs), Measure M, State Proposition 1B Funds, La Pata Road Fee Program, OC Waste & Recy- cling, County Road Fund (State gas tax) and utility reimbursements. The total estimated cost for all three phases of the La Pata project is $126.5 million. This project has been years in the making and is the result of the collaboration of many stake-


holders, including the City of San Juan Capistrano, the City of San Clemente, The Ranch, and OCTA, all which have worked very hard to make the vision of this project into reality.


WHAT’S NEXT During the next few months, the La Pata gap connector phase will progress, as crews continue


to conduct earthwork, bridge construction and paving, as well as sidewalk, traffic signals and land- scape activities. La Pata Avenue is anticipated to open and help ease your drive by fall 2016. I am very pleased to be part of this project and I look forward to improving mobility within


South County and the region at large. I-5/Ortega Highway Interchange Project Dedication In other South County transportation news, I’m also pleased to report that Caltrans, the Orange


County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and the City of San Juan Capistrano on Thursday, Oc- tober 1 marked completion of the $77.2 million I-5/Ortega Highway Interchange Improvement Project, which makes the new bridge transition seamless for daily commuters, lessens vehicle emis- sions, and gets people where they need to go sooner. The 2½-year project to modernize the interchange includes:


• A reconstructed Ortega Highway bridge over the I-5 Freeway, increasing the number of lanes on the bridge from four to eight, including turn lanes and through lanes


• Realignment of Ortega Highway west of I-5 through the downtown area of San Juan Capistrano • A new northbound loop on-ramp; and widened north and south I-5 on- and off-ramps to im- prove traffic flow The interchange is a major connection between Orange, San Diego, and Riverside Counties. This project highlights a “bridging of history,” as San Juan Capistrano’s Spanish architectural


style is reflected in colored concrete on the new bridge, as well as textured retaining walls that were hand painted. The City of San Juan Capistrano also played a key role in the project’s initiation by preparing the environmental document, from which the City Council approved the selected alter- native in January 2009. The $77.2 million project was primarily funded with $42.7 million from the State Transporta-


tion Improvement Program, $24.1 million from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Act, and $2.8 million from the Regional Improvement Program (Proposition 1B), a 2006 voter-approved bond. An additional $2.5 million was provided by Measure M, Orange County’s half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements, $3.2 million was received from the County of Orange and $1.8 mil- lion from the City of San Juan Capistrano. To date, more than $18 billion in Proposition 1B funds have been put to work statewide for transportation purposes. I was pleased to participate in the dedication ceremony and wish to thank the City of San Juan


Capistrano, Caltrans, OCTA and the business community for coming together to deliver this world- class project.


22 SANCLEMENTEJOURNAL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76