FEATURE STORY > LOOKING TO THE FUTURE Crudely Speaking
How lifting the export ban would raise much-needed revenues for oil exploration and production, while lowering prices at the pump
H
Historically, the price of West Texas Intermediate Crude (WTI) has always been slightly higher than the price of North Sea Brent Crude, the major benchmark off which two-thirds of the world’s interna- tionally traded crude oil is priced. WTI has historically been more expensive because it is “light sweet crude,” meaning it contains less than 0.5% of sulfur and is considerably lighter than water and lighter than any other crude oil, and therefore the world’s most valuable oil.
Despite possessing these very desirable physical characteristics, for the last several years WTI has regularly traded for less, some- times much less, than Brent. This situation is not only detrimental to American oil exploration and production firms but also U.S. households. Interestingly, this situation can be easily righted if only Congress would pass legislation. Let me explain.
Until 1973, U.S. oil, like all other goods and services, could be easily exported. However, an export ban was imposed after the 1973 Arab oil embargo in an attempt to prevent future oil shortages and arguably to help the U.S. gain energy independence. For decades the ban had no obvious impact as the U.S. was a huge oil importer. But now due to hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, the U.S. now produces about twice as much oil as it did a few short years ago and is now the world’s second largest oil producer.
Because the U.S. used to import large quantities of oil, and because due to geography and politics the imported oil was primarily “heavy sour crude,” most American refineries are ill equipped to refine the high quality WTI coming from the new and newly-invigorated U.S. oil fields. As a result, U.S. crude oil is quickly filing up storage tanks and in the process driving down the price as domestic supply vastly exceeds refiner demand.
If Congress were to lift the export ban, the price of WTI would rise to the world price, which would expand domestic oil exploration and production and increase rig counts and employment in the oil patch. Counterintuitively, it would also reduce the retail price of gasoline. This is because gasoline is tied to the price of Brent, since all refiners except American ones distill crude into gasoline from oil priced off of Brent.
Because the export ban does not cover distilled products like diesel, gasoline and jet fuel, the price American refiners charge for distillates is the world price, even though the crude they purchase is cheaper due to the export ban on domestic crude. Gasoline here and abroad would thus be cheaper because the release of more U.S. crude onto the world market that is now bottled up onshore due to the export ban, would reduce, albeit slightly, the price of Brent, and in the process slightly reduce the price of distillates including gasoline.
Of course there is never a free lunch in economics. Were the export ban lifted, the losers would include domestic refiners as they would pay more for crude, and foreign oil producers such as the Saudis, Russians, Canadians and others as they would receive slightly less for theirs. That said, repealing the ban makes sense. It would save U.S. consumers money and slightly increase returns to investors in the oil patch. And if the Saudis are unhappy, they can recall that the export ban only exists because they embargoed us 40 years ago!
NEW HOME BUILDERS SERVICES
ARNIE ALTSULER Managing Director Commercial & Investments
New Home
Builders Services 281/236-7777
aka@altsuler.com LAND LOTS
Article by Elliot Eisenberg, Ph.D., president of GraphsandLaughs LLC. His daily 70 word economics and policy blog can be seen at
www.econ70.com. Elliot can be reached at
Elliot@graphsandlaughs.net.
UMER AHMAD
Luxury Home Specialist Offering Custom Services
New Home Builders Services
713/725-3800
umer@kw.com
DEVELOPMENT SALES HOW MAY WE HELP YOU? Each office is independently owned and operated. GREATER HOUSTON BUILDERS ASSOCIATION – BUILDING A BETTER FUTURE | HOUSTON BUILDER | JUNE 2015 25
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52