EDITOR’S LETTER
Subscriptions Denise Adams
+44 (0)1462 471930
Circulation manager Michael Emmerson +44 (0)1462 471932
Editor
Kate Cracknell +44 (0)1462 471906
Editorial director Liz Terry
+44 (0)1462 431385
Assistant editor Katie Barnes
+44 (0)1462 471925
Head of news Jak Phillips
+44 (0)1462 471938
News desk Tom Anstey
+44 (0)1462 471916
Product editor Kate Corney
+44 (0)1462 471927
Designer Clara Nicoll
+44 (0)1767 769645
Web team Dean Fox
+44 (0)1462 471900 Emma Harris
+44 (0)1462 471921 Tim Nash
+44 (0)1462 471917
Michael Paramore +44 (0)1462 471926
Publisher Jan Williams
+44 (0)1462 471909
Sales John Challinor +44 (0)1202 742968
Astrid Ros
+44 (0)1462 471911 Julie Badrick
+44 (0)1462 471919
Financial administrator Denise Adams
+44 (0)1462 471930
Credit controller Rebekah Wilkinson +44 (0)1462 733477
Subscriptions Tel +44 (0)1462 471930
Leisure Media, Portmill House, Portmill Lane, Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG5 1DJ UK
ukactive released its new report, Turning the Tide of Inactivity. Headlines focused on the
T
shocking social aspects: the report found people in deprived areas are having their lives cut short by ill health as a result of inactivity and lack of access to exercise.
Turning the Tide of Inactivity found that
in the most deprived areas, one in three people fail to raise their pulse for even 30 minutes a month, compared to one in four in the most affluent areas. And with the most deprived local authorities accounting for 13 of the 15 least active areas in England, there’s a clear and provable correlation between wealth, activity and health.
We must avoid the temptation to accept very low level behaviour change as being a successful outcome for purely fi nancial reasons
Establishing the extent of the challenge
is a vital first step, but while it’s great work by ukactive to be bringing a fresh focus to the inactivity debate, I’m less comfortable with what appears to be happening next. That’s because the conversation is
quickly turning to the optimum ways in which changes can be made to save the government the most money via its NHS expenditure. This debate is becoming – in part – an exercise in low level thinking, with recommendations, for example, focusing on ‘nudging’ people to make very small changes to their daily routines.
he industry got some major national media coverage recently when
Talking about saving cold hard cash
is the most effective way of getting the attention of government, and with this attention – importantly – comes the money to fund health interventions. However, the recommendations I’ve heard so far are so limited in ambition that we really must ask ourselves if this is the full extent of our aspirations as a sector. The fitness industry has widened
its remit to become part of the health community in recent years, and for the most part the two are a good fit, but while public health thinking is very much focused around making very small adjustments on a mass scale to achieve change, the fitness industry has always been very customer- centric and focused on achieving the best outcomes for each and every member. We must avoid the temptation to only
adopt health industry thinking, whereby we accept very low level behaviour change as being a successful outcome for purely financial reasons. We don’t just want to feel we’ve
achieved our aims if we can just get people walking up the stairs once a week to save the government a few million pounds in blood pressure medication. We must be more ambitious than that and aim to get more people from deprived areas really engaged in an active, healthy lifestyle. Anything less is patronising and cynical. The fitness industry was founded by
people passionate about the importance and value of exercise and we know that, done regularly, it works. While it’s great that we’ve found natural bedfellows with the health industry, we must continue to champion our everlasting goal of an active, healthy nation and not get sucked into the politics to the point where we lose sight of our original vision and purpose.
Liz Terry, editorial director -
lizterry@leisuremedia.com / twitter: @elizterry To share your thoughts on this topic, visit
www.healthclubmanagement.co.uk/blog
We must stay ambitious
Download the latest issue
April 2014 © Cybertrek 2014 Read Health Club Management online at
healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital 3
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92