Too many police chiefs? - A review of police strength and costs in England & Wales 2010
SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS - THE PROS AND CONS OF FORCE MERGERS Police forces match local government boundaries – already effective accountability can be strengthened
There are a number of forces where local government boundaries already reflect the police force’s jurisdiction. These places – such as Gloucestershire, where the Constabulary covers the same area as the County Council, and the Metropolitan Police which covers the Mayor of London’s area of responsibility – already show signs of greater accountability and ownership. For example Gloucestershire County Council has funded new police officers for the force, as has the Mayor of London. In these cases accountability can be strengthened, for example through the introduction of direct elections where they do not currently take place. Police Authorities for the changed force would comprise local councillors and independent members.
Suggestion : Condense the 43 existing forces into 10 regional forces
Whilst not necessarily the perfect and certainly not the only solution, it seems to make good economic and practical sense to consider merging the forces as per the APA regional map on the page that follows.
REGIONAL FORCE
North East North West
Cleveland Cheshire
Derbyshire Durham
COMPRISING OF THE FOLLOWING FORCES
Northumbria
Cumbria Greater Manchester Lancashire Merseyside
Yorkshire & Humber Humberside North Yorkshire South Yorkshire West Yorkshire East Midlands West Midlands Wales
Leicestershire Gwent Kent
South West
South East London Eastern
Avon & Somerset Devon & Cornwall
Hampshire
City Of London Metropolitan Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire
Staffordshire Warwickshire West Mercia West Midlands Dyfed-Powys
North Wales
Dorset
Surrey
Essex South Wales
Gloucestershire Wiltshire
Sussex
Hertfordshire Thames Valley Norfolk Suffolk
On the pages that follow the map, we will show the existing police officer strength by rank, grouped to show regional totals. We have then included salary per rank with the national “actual” totals shown by region. We then illustrate by example, the extent of savings that are potentially possible, by reducing ACPO & SMT numbers and the rationalisation of police staff costs and non staff costs.
58
Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire
Chapter 5
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111