This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Too many police chiefs? - A review of police strength and costs in England & Wales 2010

The time has surely arrived for a public debate on the future size and role of the police. Now more than ever we need a public debate about priorities and choices about the sensible use of police resources.

Earlier this year, before the change of government, the Home Office under Alan Johnson from Labour, announced that it had a plan to cut overtime by £70m a year.

With Theresa May appointed the new home secretary in the new coalition Liberal Conservative Government, a Home Office spokesman has said the department would work with her to establish her priorities and "how best to implement government policy".

Recent media reports state that police spending grew in real terms from £9.8bn in 1999 to £14.5bn in 2009, however, the HMIC website puts the spending figure at £13.5 Billion. By far the major portion of the increased spending - just over 75% - has gone on staffing, with rising numbers across the different staff sectors. In 2009 there were a record 142,151 police officers - an increase of 15,337 since 1998.

Right balance?

It is clear from the numbers and financials revealed on these pages, that the proportionate growth in civilian staff, including police community support officers, has outstripped that of police officers.

Central government under Nu Labour favoured increased recruitment of police officers, but at the same time civilian staff have grown even more. When chief constables query the value of police officer recruitment, how can we be sure about the right balance of spending on employees? Will politicians' pledges to protect the 'front line' mean cuts in the back office functions?"

The true value of each and every “back office” function, along with those of the senior and middle management of the police needs thorough and in depth transparent scrutiny, if their roles are to continue.

Overtime

The recent report by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS) criticised the growing police overtime bill as "counter intuitive" because more staff should mean workers are less stretched, and therefore not required to work as many extra hours. We would argue that until vast numbers of the office based police personnel and police staff are redeployed onto the street, reducing the pressure on frontline policing, the overtime budget should be ring fenced.

36

Chapter 4 Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com