This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FEATURE PRODUCTION & ASSEMBLY REDUCING NOISE AND VIBRATION


Smaller assembly tools such as nutrunners pose just as great a health and safety risk as hammer tools when it comes to noise and vibration, says Bill Harrison of Trescal UK


because with their low unit cost replacement is preferable to repair if anything goes wrong. Inevitably, this leaves employers at risk of litigation and if the correct procedures and measurements have not been followed, prosecution and fines. Measurement is key. For example, an


N


oise and vibration are two of the most common industrial injuries.


The Health and Safety Executive estimates that more than a quarter of a million people in the UK now have injuries related to hand arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) with more than 17,000 people suffering from deafness induced by work. HAVS is caused by prolonged use of vibrating hand-held machinery which is known to have a serious effect on nerves, joints, muscles, blood vessels or connective tissues of the hand and forearm. This in turn leads to a tingling 'whiteness' or numbness of the fingers in its mildest form, through to fingers changing colour or in its most severe form considerable pain and loss of manual dexterity. Vibrating machinery is often noisy.


Riveting guns operate at circa 100-120 decibels which when you consider that a jet engine is only circa 140 decibels at take-off is very loud. The key legislation with regard to HAVS and VWF is the Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 which includes a statutory daily limit on the amount of vibration any one individual can be exposed to. Noise is controlled by the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005. However, while HAVS and noise related injuries are widely accepted and understood it would be wrong to assume that the risks are only a concern for smaller manufacturers or those with lax


14 NOVEMBER 2015 | FACTORY EQUIPMENT


health and safety procedures. Only last year a well-known global manufacturer of power generation equipment was prosecuted after one of its employees was left with a severe long-term disability following prolonged working with a range of vibrating tools. A further four employees were diagnosed as having symptoms consistent with early stage HAVS (white-finger).


RISK ANALYSIS


The court found that the company in question had failed both to manage the exposure of its employees to the serious risks of vibration for more than 10 years and to put preventive measures in place. The case highlighted a common problem in industry: risk analysis for HAVS and noise is all too often confined to larger equipment such as grinders, chainsaws and hammer tools which present a clear danger to employees. However, among the most common triggers is smaller air-powered industrial equipment used in assembly facilities including nutrunners, pneumatic impact guns, riveters, pneumatic torque wrenches and air tools which pose an inherent risk to employees but are often overlooked. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that this type of equipment is often neglected, seldom getting the care and attention given to more expensive equipment. A nutrunner for example, is rarely given any sort of maintenance


Users of vibrating hand-held tools should get them inspected and tested at least every six months


employee using a tool with significant vibration, circa 5 m/s2 for one hour would be regarded as being below the exposure action value. However, as soon as the same employee begins using the same for three hours per day they are regarded as being above the exposure action value and at risk. These parameters are broad values and do not take into account the changes that occur with any tool over time. An untested tool will inevitably be subject to wear and tear which has the capacity to increase both vibration and noise. For example, wear and tear on a bearing will increase vibration significantly. If an employer is found not to have put in place simple procedures to spot and rectify this sort of simple maintenance issue it will inevitably impact on its ability to fight any claim.


REGULAR INSPECTION AND TESTING One way of mitigating the threat is regular inspection and testing to ensure that the tool is working correctly and in line with relevant regulations, implemented by a supplier from outside the company who is able to issue independent certification. My advice to users of vibrating hand- held tools is to get them inspected and tested at least every six months. If the tool is being used constantly on a 24-hour basis this should be done every three months. Crucially, modern testing methods are


capable of reducing the potential impact on production dramatically. Mobile testing and inspection units are equipped with a wide range of equipment including rotational tachometers which can test accurately for HAVS and acoustics. The issue here is peace of mind. Once the equipment has been checked, validated and certification has been issued there is an audit trail which can be used in any future defence action.


Trescal UK T: 01252 533 300 www.trescal.com


/ FACTORYEQUIPMENT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56