Chris Koehn
Business Unit Manager—Stotz Air Gaging Advanced Machine and Engineering Co. Rockford, IL
www.ame.com
QualityScan The Benefits of In-Process Air Gaging I
n recent years, we have seen higher production manufacturers wanting to move air gaging quality checks from a stand-alone, outside-of- machine device, where the operator is performing a manual check, to an automated in-process gage. There are several reasons for this trend, such as higher quality standards, tighter tolerances, as well as running a leaner operation. The benefits are 100% inspection of the required geometric callout, as well as handshaking between measuring device and machine to make each piece better than the prior one and remove bad parts. The terms in-process and air gaging may not immediately sound like they go together. Typically, in-process gaging is some form of contact gage that is done very close to the grinding wheel or cutting tool. This process is very effective, but limited in what you are able to check. In most cases, you are simply checking a diameter. When air gaging is used in-process, there is typically some simple handling system to remove the part from the chuck or centers and place it into the air gage. Depending on the machine type, the air gage may be able to measure the part while still being clamped into the machine.
So, why would someone use air gaging instead of the usual contact method of in-process gaging? As I mentioned previously, the contact method is typically used for measuring a diameter and, in most cases, that is an outside diameter. Air gaging can be very effective at measuring more complex features such as multiple diameter steps, tapers and more sophisticated geometric callouts such as perpendicularity, straightness, parallelism and many others. It is also a very effective method for checking inside diameters including extremely small bores. You also get the other standard benefits of air gaging, which include noncontact measuring, so you don’t mark the parts and wear out the gages too quickly. There’s also a high level of repeatability and, as previously mentioned, more complex features can be measured because the air gage is designed and built for a specific task. Most contact methods are available as an option on the machine and are limited to simple features only.
A typical setup of an in-process air gage would consist of a lathe or a grinding machine turning or grinding the workpiece. Once that process is completed, the part would either be placed on or in the air gage, or the air gage would be placed on or in the workpiece through some simple handling device.
10
ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | October 2014
We find that many times robots are already being used to load or unload machines and can simply be reprogrammed to handle the air gaging task as well. The air gage column is then handshaking with the programmable logic controller (PLC) or robot. The communication is typically handled through digital input or outputs. Common handshaking would include the PLC communication to the column that the part is now in the gage and to start the measurement. The column would then mea- sure the part and send a signal to the PLC indicating that part as good or bad (accept or reject). The column would also send the offset values to the machine to make the next piece equal or better than the one just measured. This would typically be done either through the RS232 output or via Ethernet. The handling system would then remove the workpiece and place it in the appropriate location according to the good or bad signal it received. The column can also save the data to any standard SPC system.
Many times robots can simply be
reprogrammed to handle air gaging, in addition to loading and unloading.
The return on investment (ROI) of this type of setup happens much more quickly than you may think. The benefit of inspecting 100% of your workpieces and automatically sorting the good or bad parts alone ensures that you don’t accidentally send a bad piece to a customer. Also, automati- cally making offset adjustments means that each piece is equal to or better than the prior piece, resulting in less scrap. Those benefits, plus the labor cost saved, from having a person or several people manually check- ing each part, justifies the investment in a very short time. What’s more, your spindle runtime and workpiece output will both increase using this method. Because while you are measuring one piece, you are already making the next one. This ROI happens even faster if a robot for loading or unloading is already present in the manufacturing cell. If you have mid- to high-production parts that you are currently measuring offline using air gaging, you should give a serious look at automating the process. ME
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164