This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
N5 – Module 2 Financial Decision-Making in a Participatory Democracy


As mentioned above, although participatory democracy is advisable because it follows the principles of pure democracy as quoted in the definition in the Introduction, it is very impractical and would be very expensive to implement. Most modern governments attempt to implement at least some of the principles of participatory democracy into their ideology; this is done through public meetings, especially on financial matters.


In some cases, when a government is being criticised about an important issue such as the death sentence, abortion, etc. and it finds divisions amongst its elected representatives, it may decide to hold a referendum. Tis allows each citizen of a country an opportunity to vote about a particular issue.


Each time a country has an election or holds a referendum it costs a great deal of money. Imagine the cost of allowing 20 million people to say either Yes or No about all issues. So it is important to remember that although this style of democracy is the purest, it works well only in very small communities.


Case Study: Referendums in South Africa To date, South Africa has had three referendums, all of them during apartheid rule (before 1994). Te first referendum was on the 5th October 1960 and asked the question: “Are you in favour of a Republic for the Union”. Te vote was for South Africa to abandon its status as a Commonwealth realm and become its own republic separate from Great Britain. 52% of the population voted yes, while 48% voted no.


Te second referendum was held in 1983 to determine whether a tri-cameral Parliament should be in place to include Coloureds and Indians in Parliament. Te yes vote won by 66% to 33%. Te third and perhaps most famous referendum was held in 1992, and asked white voters “Do you support the continuation of the reform process which the State President began on February 2, 1992, and which is aimed at a new Constitution through negotiation?” Te yes vote won with 69% of the vote with 85% of whites voting, which ultimately helped pave the way for apartheid to be liſted.


Most modern governments have adopted what is known as a representative democracy – please see next page for a full explanation. Te decision-making process for public finance in a democracy must comply with democratic values and principles – see 10 Democratic Principles three pages back – there must be dialogue between the taxpayers, decision-makers and users of services. How is this done?


Participatory democracy is effective only in a small community where the goal would be to have decision-making which is “closer to the people”. And this means there is an attempt to move towards decentralisation of political power (taking power away from central government), and to have an increase (as much as possible) in citizen participation. It is vital that all citizens take an active part in the running of their communities in all democracies; but here, specifically, participation might mean actually physically voting in as many issues as possible: logistically difficult and expensive. However, see the Case Study: Switzerland.


30


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140