This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Freight


Is there a future for freight on rail?


Kenneth Russell outlines the GB Freight Route - the proposal for a freight preference route at a larger gauge that will drive economic growth and connect us to the heart of the European freight network


T


he majority of freight traffic in Britain today, both on long haul internal and between Britain and the continent, is carried mainly on lorry trailers via short sea routes - or the Channel Tunnel shuttle - not through rail and containers. There are 6,700,000 units per annum crossing the channel, 20 per cent is by container, 80 per cent by trailer (24 per cent unaccompanied and 56 per cent accompanied).


Britain’s European neighbours, by contrast, are able to carry lorry trailers on their rail networks as they have been built to a larger loading gauge than that in Great Britain. Network Rail and British Rail before it has altered structures to make it possible to move larger container sizes but has only achieved this capability on a limited number of routes which are already heavily used by passenger traffic. None of the existing rail routes in Britain except HS1 are cleared for lorry trailers and standard European rail wagons.


A preferential freight route We are suggesting a preferential route at a larger loading gauge, titled the GB Freight Route (GBFR). This would require very little new route, making use instead of under-utilised and disused railway corridors that can be reinstated or enhanced without adversely affecting the operation of the existing rail network. The cost of doing this is considerably less than building a new railway across virgin land as is required for the proposed HS2 route.


The scheme would be connected to the road network close to motorway junctions. It is intended that the route would become an integral part of the national rail network and would be used by operators on an open access basis. The route could be built in stages, allowing operation to start once the first section was built.


A trial and proof of concept was undertaken in May 2012 - the first train loaded with Lorry Trailers @ P/C400 gauge (four metre high trailer) was moved


from continental Europe (Antwerp) to Barking via the Channel Tunnel and HS1. GBFR has been working with many interested parties and has gained much support from road hauliers and the customer base. Most recently, the logistics department within the major supermarkets have shown interest in the possibility of being able to move much more of their goods by rail in an uninterrupted manner within mainland Britain as well as to and from continental European destinations.


Why is GB Freight Route needed? As mentioned, Britain’s railways, built largely in the 19th Century, were constructed to a smaller loading gauge than on the continent. Some have suggested that the gauge of existing routes could be enlarged, but that is not possible without completely rebuilding them. The cost of replacing the very many low bridges, tunnels and overhead line electrification systems would be prohibitive.


In addition, much of the West Coast Main Line, Midland Main Line and East Coast Main Line are now operating close to capacity during parts of the day. MDS Transmodal, transport consultant


December 2013 Page 87


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140