Flyda urban mass transit
John Emanuel of technology transfer specialists Pax Consultants takes a look back at the technology behind Flyda, a metro system with minimised infrastructure costs, which is now in the public domain.
Cutting capital costs Y
ou would think that a technology that claimed to cut the capital cost of building new transit lines in cities by up to 60%
or more, with commensurate reductions in environmental impact, and with potential service benefits, would have been an immediate success.
than was the case in the 1980s.
The second strategy was to further reduce the bridge and elevated track size, weight and cost by using a high narrow stiff beam construction and cantilevering the up-train from one side and the down-train from the other, dispensing with the usual deck (see drawing right) – rather like a monorail track but providing two tracks rather than just the one. Bridges of this type are much smaller and cheaper than conventional bridges and can be ‘installed’ rather than ‘constructed’ with far less disruption. With an emergency footpath down the centre, elevated tracks can be on the scale of a footbridge rather than a railway bridge.
Smaller, more environmentally friendly elevated tracks in many cases can also come closer to the downtown area acceptably, for example down the centre of an existing highway, thus reducing the amount of costly tunnelling needed.
Wheels on the roof
The challenge was to devise vehicle configurations that would allow coupled trains to transfer seamlessly from a tunnel in the city centre, to elevated cantilever track in the near suburbs, and at grade further out. The trains also had to operate safely through junctions.
Initially conceived and patented by Commander Francis Perrot in the 1980s and further developed in co-operation with a number of major consulting engineers and large civil and mechanical engineering groups, Perrot’s company Flyda Ltd could not endure the long time scales in metro commissioning and is no longer in business. So now the Flyda technology is in the public domain, freely available to all.
Perrot’s insight was to focus on infrastructure construction, by far the greatest source of costs and environmental impact in new transit line provision. Project budgets at that time indicated that some 80% of the total capital costs were spent on tunnels, bridges and elevated tracks and stations. How could these be minimised?
A first simple strategy was to operate frequent smaller, lower axle weight, automated trains, rather than infrequent larger trains, to meet capacity requirements. Tunnels, bridges and elevated tracks can all then be smaller, cheaper and easier on the environment. Modern computer control systems make this easier
96 | rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 13 Perrot’s
solution was simple, wonderfully ingenious, and counter-intuitive. In addition to the driven wheels under the vehicle he positioned extra wheels on both sides of the vehicle roofs. In tunnel and at grade the trains ran on the lower wheels. However, on cantilever, the vehicles’ weight was carried on the lower wheels, the upper wheels securing the vehicles to the top of the track (see drawing left).
All that remained to be determined was the switching mechanism. Avoiding moving parts on the tracks, Perrot put yet other wheels on the roof – the computer controlled pivotable ‘track selection wheels’. These could be positioned, left or right, to select the desired track as the train transfers from ground support to cantilever and back.
Matching capacity to demand
A third strategy, already in use but easier to facilitate in a new metro line, was to balance capacity across a system. Typically in the centre
of a city high-capacity trains and high-capacity stations are required. Further out, there are fewer riders so stations can be smaller. Flyda’s vehicles travelled in coupled trains but could also travel independently. Thus a 16-car train in the city centre could split at a junction into two eight-car trains further out and, theoretically, into four-car, two-car, and eventually one-car trains in the distant suburbs. Smaller trains in the suburbs, requiring smaller stations, reduce costs or allow the transit system to serve a wider community.
Flyda spent about $1m in the early 1980s on engineering design work on the tracks, vehicles and control system. In joint bids with leading UK civil and mechanical engineering contractors, Flyda made preliminary offers for a number of schemes in the UK and North America.
Flyda technology uses entirely conventional components – wheels, motors,
concrete, steel, etc – no magnetic levitation, air cushions or other exotic or expensive elements.
This technology offers potential opportunities to urban mass transit authorities, and to civil, mechanical and electrical contractors, to build and use urban mass transit systems at half or less the capital cost of conventional systems, with far lower environmental impact and superior passenger service.
The challenge is to build the first one!
John D Emanuel was a Director of Flyda Ltd for a period in the 1980s. FOR MORE INFORMATION
A longer version of this article is available at
www.railtechnologymagazine.com search Flyda
Also see
http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/ itrans/
flyda.htm or email john.emanuel@pax.
co.uk
brakes,
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100