This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LONDON UNDERGROUND


Enhancing the strength of cast iron beams at Embankment


Martin Richardson, target market manager for flooring and refurbishment at Sika, discusses the UK’s largest CFRP plate bonding project.


As


part of a major strengthening programme on the London


Underground, an innovative solution was required to provide long term strengthening to over 90 cast iron beams. Following an extensive design and specification process, the result is the UK’s largest-ever application of ultra high modulus composite reinforcement, supplied by global building product manufacturer Sika and national specialist contractor, CRL (Concrete Repairs LTD).


Covered Ways CW17 and CW20 are on either side of Embankment station on the District line, built in the 19th century using ‘cut and cover’ techniques. The covered ways carry the weight of Embankment Gardens, situated above the District line tracks. Although the cast iron beams were assessed and found to be adequate to support the intended loadings and in a good serviceable condition, there was serious concern that the cast iron beams could be overstressed under unforeseen overloading.


London Underground undertook a feasibility study to determine the best all-round solution to complete this strengthening. The best solution, both economically and logistically, was to strengthen the beams in-situ. London Underground had to ensure the chosen repair solution would have minimal impact on the tunnel headroom and could be installed during engineering hours (overnight when there is no train service) so as to cause no disruption to the District and Circle line services. With a reinforced steel element deemed too thick to be a viable option, a system that was thin yet extremely tough was required.


The solution to the challenge lay with Sika CarboDur UHM and a well-planned application procedure. An Ultra High Modulus Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) system,


Sika CarboDur UHM is designed for high performance and demanding reinforcement applications. The plates, measuring 7.3m long, 200mm wide (2no per beam) and maximum 4.7mm thick, and offering exceptional reinforcing capability, proved the ideal solution. With over 1,300mtr of Sika Carbodur UHM plates applied, it has marked the UK’s largest ever project to use ultra high modulus composite.


Specialist contractor Concrete Repairs Limited carried out the skilled application, having been appointed by LU Framework Contractor Clancy Docwra. The process began with each beam, measuring 7.5m long and 0.5m wide, cleaned using a powerful grit blasting technique that removed grease, oil, rust and any other contaminants that could reduce adhesion. Once dried, a coat of SikaCor-EG 1 primer was applied, followed by the application of a resin to prepare the surface.


Ensuring secure, reliable attachment of the Sika CarboDur Plates, SikaDur structural epoxy adhesive was then applied to both the underside of the cast iron and the plate itself. When placing the plate into position, full contact of the adhesive to the two surfaces guaranteed a long-term bond was achieved before a series of temporary supports were put in place whilst the adhesive cured.


The excellent performance of the adhesive allowed installation to carry on throughout the winter months when low temperatures and condensation can cause problems for other adhesives.


To minimise service disruption on the District and Circle lines, the entire process had to be completed during engineering hours and was scheduled to be delivered in a series of shifts


between 1am and 5am, over a period of six months. In each shift, the project team had to erect scaffolding, transport the equipment and materials to the desired location and clean and prepare the beams before applying the Sika CarboDur UHM plates and temporary supports. The supports, scaffolding and equipment was then removed to allow the underground to reopen.


Olu Ogunwale, contracts manager at Concrete Repairs, said: “The Sika solution proved the most practical method to strengthen the beams. With severely restricted access, in terms of both space available and the four hour window in which we could work, its ease of application – combined with a carefully managed schedule – enabled the project to be delivered within the allotted timeframe.”


The bespoke Pre-Preg manufacturing process used to create the UHM plates also ensured maximum efficiency with the creation of homogenous individual plates to the exact design dimensions in terms of length, width and thickness.


At Embankment, this included specifically designed tapers in the end of the plates to reduce peel stresses to absolute minimum, the inclusion of a small cut out in the end of the plate for increased tolerance around a downstand in the soffit of the cast iron, and fully applied fire protection to all exposed surfaces of the plate.


By overcoming the extreme time and spatial constraints of the London Underground, the client, contractors and material suppliers demonstrated outstanding workmanship and expertise to complete the project on time and on budget.


Delivered over a six month period, the project was successfully finished to the highest standard with the contractors reinforcing an average of two beams per night on-site.


Thanks to a well-organised, detailed process, this length of London Underground was able to remain fully operational throughout, with the service’s passengers entirely unaware of the vital work being undertaken.


FOR MORE INFORMATION


T: 0800 1123863 W: www.sikaconstruction.co.uk or gbr.sika. com/en/solutions_products/Construction/ structural-refurbishment/rail.html


rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 13 | 45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100