COMMENT
The eight principles of an integrated network
1. A harmonised and simplified fares system
He blamed overly-complex fare regimes, perceptions about high fares, and passenger wariness over journeys involving a change of train (only 12% of trips involve transferring between trains at the moment – less than one in eight journeys).
He said parts of Europe have done a much better job of addressing these problems to better integrate their rail
networks, and
said: “We’re proposing, through the vision, a radically simplified fares structure spanning across all local authority boundaries, getting rid of this issue about PTE border areas, for example.
“There should be a timetable to meet customers’ differing needs, rather than the operational convenience of individual franchisees.”
He said the lack of city-region inter-connectivity is “really limiting the effectiveness of the Northern economy”, since wider travel markets tend to extend further than any single region.
“The North really misses out on agglomeration economics,” he said, despite the steady expansion of some business sectors in particular parts of the North.
“There is a real opportunity to make better use of international gateways”, he said, “including airports and ports, and to use railways to connect areas of economic disadvantage with areas of economic opportunity.”
Infrastructure and services
The strategy is not just a wish-list of infrastructure scheme or lines to re-open: it acknowledges that for this control period and CP5, the likely major infrastructure projects are basically set already.
“That means there’s not so much influence we can have over Network Rail and the industry in the short-term, but as far as the medium and long-term is concerned, we feel we’ve set out some key aspirations for the industry to respond to. The strategy is meant to be a live document, not something to sit on the shelf for 30 years. It will evolve.”
He said the electrification of key routes in the North, and associated plans for rolling stock cascades, should address a few major issues at once, as well as helping improve people’s perceptions of rail to encourage modal shift.
Mackay also said that, despite political sensitivities, the efficiencies agenda meant that there would have to be a debate about some of the least-used train services and stations.
He explained: “Some people may think certain trains are absolutely essential, but in fact, could some of that rolling stock be better used elsewhere? How would the potential specifiers of future franchises rearrange things?
“You do need to ask, if a station has fewer than 10 people using it every day, or even a week in some cases, is there any economic sense in keeping these stations open? Other public transport could be provided as an alternative. Politically, that can be incredibly sensitive, but these are the types of issues the politicians need to address.”
Tackling the cost of travel and journey times
Alongside the aim of doubling rail’s share of journeys, the strategy also includes an “ambitious but achievable” target of cutting the generalised cost of rail travel (a weighted combination of how long it takes to travel door-to-door plus the cost of the fare) by 25%. Mackay said: “That will require attention across a number of elements of the rail journey, including journey time, frequency, interchange, fares, information, marketing, and access to the network.
2. The adoption of a tiered service specification, with European style high- speed systems at the top, followed by inter-regional expresses, urban commuter services, community railways, then metros and LRTs.
3. Ensuring timetables are designed to provide good connections between connecting rail services.
4. Ensuring extensive and user-friendly information is provided explaining how people can connect to other modes.
5. Designing and operating stations to facilitate transfers between all rail services and onward connections via bus, tram, cycle or car.
6. Operational practices designed to facilitate through-journeys, including those involving interchange between different operators, and simple through-ticketing.
7. Investment in infrastructure and rolling stock to create a safe and pleasant travelling and waiting environment that’s accessible for all, to avoid overcrowding and to facilitate the design of a connectional timetable.
8. A progressive introduction of these principles, achieved through the franchise specifications and input into ongoing rail planning processes, and through supporting activities of local planning authorities.
already much faster in terms of connectivity into London from the North, but when we look at the North’s own economy, and the east-west axis, the car is still quicker.”
Mackay concluded: “We hope this vision will be used as a guide for the franchises when they’re re-set over the following few years, giving a single co-ordinated stakeholder voice.
“We think a more efficient railway will contribute towards a reduction in unit costs, both through increasing patronage and in reduced operating costs. We believe journey times really do need to be reduced, and our strategy assumes a 20% reduction.
“For example, Newcastle-Liverpool, which is currently 3h20 (20 minutes longer than it takes in a car), should be around 2h40. Rail needs to be made more attractive to car users. Rail’s
“It sets out some clear ambitions and a determined focus. For those of us living here, as well as for
businesses and prospective businesses, the rail network should be a real asset to the North.”
Euan Mackay FOR MORE INFORMATION
When the consultation is launched, the website will be:
www.railstrategynorth.com
rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 13 | 15
©
www.projectmapping.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100