This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Media Relations


and Media Relations [Part 1] By Michael Sabbeth


Answers, Character


ANSWERING QUESTIONS IS A UNIQUE HUMAN CHARACTERISTIC, motivated and compelled by forces embedded deep within one’s character, world view and soul. Answering questions illuminates how we interact with the world. In the movie of that name, Shrek pointed out that ogres have layers. So does answering questions. The process incorporates complex layers of skill, including the capacity for factual analysis, moral reasoning, humility, discipline, knowledge and wisdom. This three-part article presents several skills and perspectives


in the context of media relations relating to athletes in the shooting sports. I emphasize, however, that the article’s themes and methods transcend media relations and are transferable to every interaction in life.


I. Credibility and Your Audience A core goal of media relations


is persuasively conveying a mes- sage with integrity and authority to an audience. There are other goals, to be sure, which will be addressed, but the preeminence of this goal is unsurpassed. Since the essence of media re- lations is persuasively commu- nicating a message, it is helpful to draw upon Aristotle’s three appeals or modes of persuasion stated in his Rhetoric—ethos, lo- gos and pathos—to give insight and awareness into the persua- sion process. Logos, Greek for ‘word,’ refers


to the facts, the content, the in- ternal consistency of the mes- sage, the statement itself. Logic, reason and evidence are, in the- ory but not always, the basis for the appeal to an audience. Pathos, meaning suffering or experience, is often connoted as an emotional appeal to an audience, but the concept of emotion is too limited. Pathos in- corporates concepts of empathy, sympathy, imagination, and bias, prejudice and similar character-


38 USA Shooting News | Spring 2013


istics. Pathos creates a binding or sympathetic feeling with the audience that logic and reason alone would not achieve. Nazi propaganda and the image of the Volk are classic examples of pathos, as are appeals based on racial or economic stereotypes. Ethos, Greek for ‘character,’


is the third of Aristotle’s appeals or modes of persuasion. Ethos refers to the trustworthiness or credibility of the speaker. Ethos


dictates the composition of the speaker’s logos and pathos. What the speakers accepts as facts or rejects as facts in the logos or how information is com- municated through pathos di- rectly determines the character, the credibility, indeed, the ethical content, of the speaker. Thus, every athlete should understand that ethos is you: what you stand for; what kind of arguments you make and what kind of argu-


ments you refuse to make. I as- sert that ethos is the most criti- cal appeal in the public relations context. The prudent athlete will use


Aristotle’s three appeals for per- suasion to enhance self-evalua- tion regarding his or her words— what should be said and what should not be said—just as the athlete critically evaluates every aspect of his or her shooting mechanics and mental training.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68