This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Industry Comment


Simplifying a complex business


Attention to detail is the key to success in the airline industry, says Rob Britton who encourages managers to always accept there’s a problem as the first step to the best solutions


The airline industry, including suppliers who read this magazine, has long been enormously complex. It’s a business of details and every one


of them needs attention in order to deliver a safe, reliable, consistent and humane service. And complexity seems to be increasing; as volumes rise infrastructure is stretched and product offerings multiply.


Simultaneously, airlines in competitive markets – increasingly the norm, as governments privatise carriers and open their domestic and global routes to market forces – face financial pressures from soaring fuel, downward price pressure from new entrants, and other factors. Could comprehensive efforts to simplify be a way


to improve results? At first glance you might think not, but actual recent experience says emphatically ‘yes’.


In order to understand the yes, we must understand how airlines and their suppliers breed complexity. First, leaders fundamentally understand that their decisions will add complexity, but they assume it will be


“A new IFE system or catering design will affect multiple departments and often they are not part of the initial planning”


manageable and, more important, it will be revenue-positive (more precisely, the present value of future benefits minus costs will be positive). Adding an aircraft type is a good example: a different airplane drives maintenance costs, pilot and cabin-crew training, and other expense, but the revenue benefit of the new type (greater capacity, more schedule flexibility, etc.) will exceed additional cost.


Second, most airline organisations are strongly functional (operations,


marketing, finance, and so on) and typically do not communicate well across functions, which compounds complexity cost. Changes to


inflight product are good examples: a new IFE system or catering design will


36 www.onboardhospitality.com


affect multiple departments, and often they are not part of the initial planning or decision- making.


Third, some managers will either passively accept preventable complexity or wilfully add to it to seem more self-important or to protect their job. Never underestimate the windbags! During the last years of my long career with a major US airline, good news was rare but major rays of sunshine beamed from an enterprise- wide simplification effort. In a culture not given to questioning, leaders and managers were encouraged to ‘ask why.’ The results were remarkable. For example, reducing fleet types from 13 to six saved hundreds of millions of dollars. Aggregate simplification savings exceeded 5% of total expense.


Whether your business is under siege, as ours was, or just strives to improve, here are basic steps to help simplify: 1. Admit there’s a problem – there almost always is.


2. Build cross-functional communication, especially before big decisions are made.


3. Make sure everyone understands it’s okay – it’s great – to ask why; identify and sanction those who discourage candor.


4. Make clear that simplification is not about job loss – time saved will be more productively used.


5. Create tangible rewards and, more importantly, recognition for champions of simplification.


6. Track financial benefits and communicate them widely.


7. Measure intangibles, too, like greater job satisfaction.


Dr. Rob Britton leads AirLearn (www.AirLearn. Net), a consultancy that helps people to understand the complex and ever-changing airline industry, and to translate those insights and knowledge into effective business results.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92