PRACTICE MANAGEMENT | MARKETING SKILLS | In some cases, adopting
big business branding tactics could actually have a
negative impact on your small business.
might be if your clinic is the only facility in a 300 kilometre radius offering the newest energy-based skin tightening system. Or if your clinic is in a particularly unique location that attracts a high-end clientele.
Big business branding principles In some cases, adopting big business branding tactics could actually have a negative impact on your small business. A brand and its ability to drive consumer spending behaviour is mostly based on the customer experience. By following the tactics of an elite group of mega consumer companies that
have
highly-recognisable brand names and an entire marketing team supporting them, you may be blowing your budget on strategies that do not work for a solo clinic or small group of practitioners. The implication that smaller firms
should spend big money on branding and marketing in the hope of replicating the success of these huge firms is flawed. This way of thinking tends to focus on large consumer brands that have big budgets and cast a wide net. The playing field is just not equal. The fallacy with this thought process is that the best practices of large service brands, such as McDonaldÕs, Starbucks or Virgin Atlantic, underestimate the differences between small businesses that cater to a unique
and mainly local clientele, and brands that have customers across a wide range of consumer segments and geographical regions. Another intrinsic disconnect is that it is
far easier to duplicate the customer experience of these large brands than it is to recreate the culture, staff, and expertise at a group of aesthetic clinics in different geographic regions. More and more cities and villages are literally dotted with aesthetic clinics, medispas and hospitals offering some selection of injectable wrinkle relaxers, dermal fillers, and laser and light-based treatments. Therefore, small businesses cannot
learn a lot by studying the behaviour of global companies and well-established household brand names. The rules under which these businesses operate are simply not applicable to smaller companies that tend to be privately owned and managed. Big brands tend to have similar corporate structures and are typically public companies. They also tend to have sales and marketing models that are far beyond the reach of any entrepreneur. Consider chains such as Boots and
Superdrug, Tony & Guy and Saks Hair & Beauty Salons, which operate in a similar manner with regard to their marketing strategies. Their individual branding plays a huge role in differentiating between these offerings that tend to be rather similar in nature. Solo aesthetic clinics or medispas face
a unique set of challenges when it comes to differentiation. If they feature a commodity offering that is just like everyone elseÕs offering, it is quite difficult for them to compete on the basis of their branding tactics alone. By creating differentiation through print advertising, web marketing, and daily deals, small businesses end up competing in the same territory as large national chains, which have deeper pockets, external agency support, and much greater reach. Some examples of expensive marketing
96 ❚
tactics that are not cost-effective are television adverts, bus stop adverts and billboards. In the authorÕs experience, these are rarely successful for small aesthetic clinics because they are not targeted to reach the right clientele who are both motivated to have cosmetic procedures and can afford the spend. It is extremely difficult and costly for a clinic with one location, or even a few satellite
March 2012 |
prime-journal.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112