This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Images courtesy of Airbus.


A320neo


re-designed B737, the B737NG+, to about 2019 or 2020. Fitting the B737 with new engines would enable Boeing to have an aircraft ready by 2016. The company estimates that a re-engined B737 would offer fuel savings of about 10%, while a new design would double the fuel savings.


He calls the A320neo “the right product at the right time”, a reference to the debate about whether to go for new engines or embrace a fundamentally new design altogether. For its part, Airbus management reckons that the additional savings associated with a new design, while attractive, are not worth the additional cost. By its own estimate, this would be about 10 times as expensive as the new engine option. Airbus puts the development cost for the A320neo at “slightly above €1 billion”.


Surprise move?


For all its merits, the decision to proceed took some observers by surprise. Calgary-based aviation analyst, Rick Erickson, points out that between them Airbus and Boeing have well over 6,000 orders for their current narrowbody models in the pipeline – a “major disincentive to inventing a new mousetrap”.


www.routesonline.com


Resources are another major factor. Airbus has been stretched with its development of the A350 and the issues with the A380, plus the 400M, while Boeing is over three years behind schedule with the B787 and well over one year in arrears with the B747-8, remarks George Hamlin, principal of Washington-based aviation consultants ACA Associates. The contract to develop a new tanker for the US Air Force will also eat up resources.


Airbus had been weighing up its options for about 18 months, and most of that decision-making process was spent on the assessment of the necessary resources, Pardoe says.


Boeing’s response


Boeing has yet to declare itself on the narrowbody front, but the US maker has indicated repeatedly that it is leaning towards a new design. By its own estimates, that would push the entry for a


Boeing has also indicated that it is looking at the possibility of a twin-aisle design. Pardoe has misgivings about this direction, recalling earlier attempts that failed to bear fruit. “Twin-aisle is not something that has our customers pounding on the door; it’s something that looks like a luxury,” he comments, adding “we already offer a wide aisle to speed up boarding and deplaning times”. Observers reckon that Boeing will make a move by the summer. According to Morgan Stanley, Airbus’ commitment to proceed with the A320neo is putting the pressure on its US rival to come to a decision on its narrowbody contender. Senior Boeing executives stated in February that they aim to have a decision by mid year.


Other manufacturers


Arguably there is additional pressure from two other contenders on the horizon – Comac’s C919 and Bombardier’s C–series. The latter has found favour with Republic Airways Holdings, parent of Frontier Airlines, and several regional carriers. It is the launch customer for the larger CS300, a 138-seat plane that is due to enter service in the second quarter of 2015. The smaller CS100 is scheduled to come on stream one year earlier. The C series competes at the smaller end of the narrowbody spectrum covered by Boeing and Airbus, notably against the A319 and the 737-700. To date, Bombardier has 90 fi rm orders for its C–series and options for another 90. Its customer list includes strong


51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100