CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Restoration is not a substitute to conservation, but if done with adequate planning and multi-stakeholder involvement, can provide an effective tool for restoring lost ecosystem services. The result should also provide great returns on these investments. However, there are examples where restoration projects have failed or resulted in new problems such as introducing pests or invasive species. The guidelines in this chapter are aimed at reducing these risks.
Various guidelines for restoration projects have been devel- oped, including strategies from the Society for Ecological Res- toration (SER) International (SER, 2010). While such guide- lines are available, it is imperative to stress the importance of stakeholder involvement and particularly raising the awareness of services provided by the ecosystems and the current and fu- ture costs associated with their degradation and ultimate loss.
It is essential to raise awareness among the general public, policy makers and environmental managers on the crucial role ecosystems and biodiversity play in providing ecosystem ser- vices. This includes a particular focus on water filtration and supply, waste water cleaning, flood and storm barriers, polli- nation, nutrients, pest- and erosion control, food security and public health and poverty alleviation.
It is imperative that awareness is raised in relation to the costs associated with ecosystem degradation, lost labor productiv- ity, lost incomes from tourism and increased expenses in production.
As many ecosystems are already degraded to some extent, of the cost-savings, benefits and not the least potential solutions to common political challenges that restoration can contribute to. Already at this stage it is important to consider the stake- holders involved.
If this awareness is available as the basis for decision mak- ing – the actual implementation process also requires direct considerations, which will vary highly from each specific site, case and stakeholders involved: This includes (adopted from SER, 2010):
Conceptual planning identifies the restoration project site, specifies its current state of health and the goals of restoration, and provides relevant background information including stake- holder involvement. Conceptual planning is conducted when restoration appears to be a feasible option but before a final decision has been made to exercise that option. Conceptual planning provides preliminary information on the habitat or ecosystem such as the identification of stressors, the extent/ health of its connectivity to the larger landscape, the need for engineering and biotic interventions, and representative mea- surements and surveys.
Preliminary tasks are those upon which project planning de- pends. These tasks form the foundation for well-conceived restoration project design. Preliminary tasks include the docu- mentation of existing site conditions (biotic and abiotic) includ- ing baseline measurements, the establishment of a reference model to guide the project work towards its intended goals, planning for experimental plots within the large project, and the appointment of a project manager and team with expertise
95
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112