Mekong Delta mangrove forest restoration
CASE STUDY #23
Large-scale restoration of mangrove forests are feasible and affordable. The largest mangrove restoration was that of the
mangrove forest in the Mekong Delta completely destroyed by the US Air Forces in the 1970’s (above) and subsequently restored by the Vietnamese government.
Black and white insert: “Results of Defoliation Operation”, illustration from ‘Vietnam Studies: Tactial and Material Innovations’, by Lieutenant General John H. Hay, Jr.;
www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/Vietnam/tactical. Colour im- age: Professor Nguyen Homg, Universidad de Hanoi, Vietnam.
The costs to successfully restore both the vegetative cover and ecological functions of a mangrove forest have been reported to range from USD 225/ha to USD 216,000/ha (Lewis, 2001). Mangrove restoration projects have been classified into three categories (Lewis, 2001; 2005): (1) planting alone, (2) hydro- logic restoration, with and without planting, and (3) excavation or fill, with and without planting. The first type, planting only, although inexpensive (e.g.: USD 100–200/ha) usually does not succeed due to a failure to appreciate the physiological tol- erances of mangroves to tidal inundation. The second type,
66
hydrologic restoration, can be done for similar costs, and with proper planning has a high success rate. Successful restora- tion of abandoned shrimp aquaculture ponds is an example of this method. Planting should only be done if natural recolo- nization fails, and can double the cost of a project. Scientific data indicates that using this method, ecological functions are quickly restored, with fish populations typically reaching refer- ence site diversity and densities within 5 years. The third type, excavation and fill, is the most expensive due to the high costs of large scale earthmoving.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112