2) Recognize the value of eco-engineering design. Invest-
ing in design work is sometimes seen as an unnecessary ex- pense. However, an appropriate level of eco-engineering design can save construction costs, reduce the need for adaptive man- agement or post-project remediation, and greatly improve the ecological value of the restored habitat. Given that land acquisi- tion costs are often the largest financial burden to a restoration project, there is a positive benefit/cost ratio to restoring higher quality habitat per unit area of land,
3) Maximize geomorphic and ecological benefits. Restor-
ing the physical integrity of the habitat offers the best opportu- nity for restoring ecological integrity. One key to effective resto- ration is preparing the site appropriately to encourage a natural evolution. Effective restoration allows for natural response to infrequent, dynamic disturbance events. Consideration of eco- logical functioning under atypical environmental conditions will increase restoration resilience.
4) Restore the landscape. Place restoration projects to maxi- mize ecosystem mosaics and connectivity across a landscape, and with size of project economies of scale result. Restoring wetlands through an estuary and catchment can help maintain staging areas for migratory fish and birds, as well as support wider ecology, particularly in systems were this connectivity has been degraded or lost. Apparent redundancy of habitat ele- ments is an important aspect of natural landscapes; during in- frequent disturbance events, such as floods or fires, these less obvious habitat features may offer critical refugia. Restoration projects should be phases across a landscape and over time to maximize benefits of interim habitat as part of a landscape mo- saic. In coastal areas space is a scarce and critical resource. On river floodplains removing levees and restoring wetlands
reduces flood levels system wide leading to ecological benefits and reduced flood risk to local communities.
5) Involve the community. Community awareness, educa-
tion and support greatly enhances the level of funding and political backing for habitat restoration activities. Community outreach, education and involvement are important of many successful restoration activities. Simple measures such as in- volvement with planting projects or stream clearance can help build awareness. In California, grassroots organizations such as “Save the Bay” have been particularly effective in educat- ing local populations and keeping environmental restoration in the spotlight. Currently more than 70% of the Bay Area population not only support local wetlands restoration but are willing to pay additional taxes towards the process. Increasing level of public outreach may, over time, lead to shifts in public perception of restoration to one of a social gain rather than loss, and so lead to political support for widespread restora- tion. This is also crucial for addressing the initial pressures leading to degradation in the first place, such as pollution or unsustainable harvest.
6) Be patient and monitor. Ecosystem restoration takes time
to progress along evolutionary trajectories and to re-establish complexity in form and function. However, delaying to restore a landscape can increase level of effort or result in restoration of former habitats being unachievable.
7) Avoid transplantation of non-indigenous species and
diseases/pests – and pay particular attention to the risk of exotic species invasions, unintended transfer of diseases and pests, even when translocating apparently similar or identi- cal species.
83
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112