WHAT ARE THE HUMAN LIVELIHOODS/ HUMAN WELL-BEING IMPACTS OF FOREST RESTORATION?
Forest restoration can also play crucial role in livelihood improve- ments and human well-being. These benefits include enhancing adaptation capacity, contributing to food security and improving the livelihoods of people depended on forest ecosystems, com- munity empowerment among other things (CIFOR, 2002) .For example, in the Shinyanga region of Tanzania, the HASHI pro- gram helped local people from 833 villages to restore 350,000 ha of acacia and miombo woodland through traditional pastoralist practices in only 18 years. The benefits to people livelihoods have been significant. Ecological restoration can also improve produc- tivity, livelihoods and economic opportunities through reducing soil degradation, desertification and water loss. Experience from these and other forest restoration projects, show that in most cases it is of paramount importance that local communities are placed in the centre of attention (i.e. considered as the key actors and in- volved in decision-making processes). Crucial issues to consider when implementing forest restoration are land tenure, incentives,
access to resources and to management rights, natural versus exotic species, and appropriate monitoring and evaluation instru- ments (CIFOR, 2002; WRI, 2005; Chazdon, 2008). Additionally, enabling conditions are always strongly policy-related. Sometimes they may have to be simple set-ups which strongly facilitate deci- sion-making and implementation processes. Economic push and pull mechanisms are needed to launch a policy dialogue, involving both government representatives and the poorest
CHALLENGES
There are many challenges to successful forest restoration. For example, a high rate of failure will result in plantations if selected tree species are not suited to site conditions or if the appropriate hydrological patterns are not also restored, too few species are planted. Invasive species may establish more easily in monoculture tree plantations and have greater susceptibility to species-specific pathogens (Chazdon 2008).
The future implications of large-scale forest restoration on the structure and composition of forests, landscapes and fauna is
CASE STUDY #3
Regenerating Woodlands: Tanzania’s HASHI Project
In the Shinyanga region of Tanzania, large areas of dense acacia and miombo woodland were cleared by 1985, transforming the landscape into semi-desert. The HASHI project, whose success was recognized by the UN Development Programme with an Equator Initiative prize in 2002, helped local people from 833 villages to restore 350,000 ha of acacia and miombo woodland through traditional pastoralist practices in only 18 years. Its strik- ing success stems from the rich ecological knowledge and strong traditional institutions of the agro-pastoralist Sukuma people who live in the region. By 2004, 18 years into the project, at least 350,000 hectares of ngitili (the Sukuma term for enclosures) had been restored or created in 833 villages, encompassing a popula- tion of 2.8 million (Barrow and Mlenge 2004:1; Barrow 2005b). Benefits of the restoration include higher household incomes, better diets, and greater livelihood security for families in the re- gion. Nature has benefited too, with a big increase in tree, shrub, grass, and herb varieties, as well as bird and mammal species.
The Shinyanga case illustrates the importance of working with local people. In the past, the state imposed its own solutions, which often failed. The Shinyanga project has involved local people in the entire process of landscape restoration. It has built on local institutions rather than creating new ones. Villages have been encouraged to pass their own by-laws to protect com- munal ngitilis (enclosures of acacia-miombo woodlands), and traditional village guards monitor activities in the ngitilis. Local involvement has been critical to the success of the project. For- est restoration has also strongly benefited from the Tanzanian government’s push towards decentralisation, which involved the allocation of clear land rights to local communities. Greater se- curity of land tenure has engendered a sense of ownership and responsibility among the Sukuma agropastoralists, whose large herds of cattle now co-exist in a healthier environment.
Source: Monela et al, 2004
27
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112