search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Trump Indictment


How Big a Deal Is It? S


Alan Dershowitz Says: A Strong Indictment — but Strong Enough?


pecial counsel Jack Smith is both confi dent in his case against Don-


ald Trump and sensitive to po- litical considerations — though those considerations are sub- tler than the kind of partisan advantage that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is after. That’s why Smith brought


the charges in Florida. He thinks the case is strong enough that a jury will convict Trump even in a jurisdiction of diverse party affi liations. His confi dence may also


explain why he alleged that Trump willfully rather than negligently mishandled clas-


sifi ed material. He might also have wanted to distinguish Trump’s case from those of Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Mike Pence, none of which al- legedly involved willfulness. What should have begun


as a routine civil investigation under the Presidential Records Act has ended up with a multi- count criminal indictment, the fi rst federal prosecution ever of a former president or a leading candidate for the presidency. This is partially because


prosecutors targeted Trump and partially because of the un- wise way he responded. Bragg campaigned for his offi ce on a promise to hold


Trump accountable and de- livered when he persuaded a grand jury to hand up a weak indictment. Smith was appointed spe-


cifi cally to investigate Trump, and he did his job well. The problem inheres in the offi ce of special counsel, which by its nature selects its target and looks for evidence against him. Smith had a lot of help from


Trump. Had the former presi- dent cooperated with investiga- tors and immediately returned all the classifi ed material in his possession, as Biden and Pence did, charges would have been unlikely. The defense team will claim


that Trump was entitled to maintain possession of classi- fi ed material under the Presi- dential Records Act of 1978, which establishes detailed procedures for handling the records of former presidents


AUGUST 2023 | NEWSMAX 53


ANDREW KELLY-POOL/GETTY IMAGES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100