Books Lost Generation


American children are being educated to have hard-line progressive views that will destroy this country.


T BY LISA SCHIFFREN


oward the end of stolen Youth: How Radicals Are Erasing Innocence and Indoc- trinating a Generation, in a


chapter called “Child Soldiers,” the author notes that children educated between 1933 and 1945 in Hitler’s Ger- many were more deeply antisemitic than generations prior or subsequent. That is because they were indoctri-


nated in Nazi ideology and pet hatreds in schools and youth groups more directly than their parents or children. Comparisons of anything happen-


ing in America today to Hitler’s Ger- many are generally over the top. But this one hit home. American children being educat-


ed today, and for the past decade, and probably the decade to come in our public schools are going to have hard-line left-wing, “progressive” views, especially on transgender ide- ology, sexual and racial issues, and climate change. Those broad categories permeate


many matters of policy and values — and morality — that form our culture. Stolen Youth, by conservative jour-


nalists Karol Markowicz and Betha- ny Mandel, describes what exactly is being taught to America’s children, how, and what the left hopes to gain. It off ers parents who disagree


with the radical agenda advice about what to do about it. Mostly that boils down to fi ghting the indoctrination. Some fi ghts are more straightfor- ward than others. On page one, Mandel writes (the


authors alternate chapters so you know which one is writing) that progressives don’t have many kids. But “their aim is ideological capture of a generation, but it’s not their kids they’re working to brainwash — it’s ours.” She describes an “all-out battle


Stolen Youth: How Radicals Are Erasing Innocence and Indoctrinating a Generation By Karol Markowicz and Bethany Mandel DW Books, 304 pages, $17.98


40 NEWSMAX | AUGUST 2023


against the American family.” The chapters that follow make an excel- lent case about what is happening, and rather eff ectively. Why? Because the hard left, what the authors call the “radical, progres-


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100