— ADVERTISEMENT — ADVERTISEMENT
YOU DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH... Demand Justice for Jewish Students
New report shows skyrocketing attacks on students’ Jewish identity—rooted in anti-Zionism, a modern disguise for classic antisemitism. It’s time to fight back.
Despite rising campus attacks on Israel, most Jewish students still support the Jewish state. But anti-Zionist hatred in the classroom and public square forces many students to hide their Jewish identity. Greater enforcement of Title VI anti-discrimination laws promises a cure to this injustice.
What are the facts? According to a new report by AMCHA Initiative, bullying and intimidation of Jewish students on university campuses tripled in the last year, while attempts to censor Zionism increased six-fold. Calls to reject Jewish identity trips to Israel increased nearly 20-fold. Reminiscent of Jewish persecution in 1930s Nazi Germany, some 50% of U.S. Jewish students say they hide their Jewish identity, according to a 2021 poll by the Brandeis Center for Human Rights.
While discrimination against most ethnic minorities is strictly censured on campus, university administrators have generally failed to protect Jewish students from attacks against them. Fortunately, a spate of complaints recently filed with the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (OCR) now demand redress under Title VI anti-discrimination statutes. Currently, George Washington University, City University of New York, University of Vermont, University of Illinois and University of Southern California are among schools facing OCR investigation for alleged antisemitism violations.
Jewish students who feel their Jewish identity is threatened can seldom rely on their schools’ harassment policies to protect them. Tese policies usually forbid harassment based on one’s ethnicity or religion, but in most cases, university administrators do not recognize hostility toward Israel and its supporters as a religious or ethnic issue.
Tis approach by university administrators ignores the definition of antisemitism established by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which is recognized worldwide and includes discrimination and demonization based on anti-Israel hate.
Antisemitic attacks on campus must be prosecuted
Fortunately, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 may offer powerful recourse for Jewish students under attack. Because the statute prohibits discrimination based on ethnic identity, recent complaints to the OCR emphasize the integral connection between Zionism and Jews’ historic relationship to their ancestral home, the land of Israel. Indeed, Zionism is not a political opinion— it is a fundamental feature of Jewish ethnic identity. Likewise, the Jews are not simply a religious group, but rather are a people
who also share language, culture, ancestry and a powerful territorial heritage.
Not surprisingly, the AMCHA report implicated pro-Palestinian groups, such as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) for responsibility in targeting Jewish students. Indeed, the report found that anti-Zionist groups like SJP were the largest overall contributors to attacks on Jewish identity. Despite their pattern of stoking antisemitic hate, to date only a single chapter of SJP has been permanently shut down on a U.S. campus—at New York’s private Fordham University. Te ban was upheld in court.
AMCHA’s report also noted the contribution of nominally Jewish anti-Zionist groups and individuals to the assault on Jewish identity. One such group is Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), which uses its spurious Jewish identity as cover for antisemitism.
Bad enough that Jewish students are targeted for persecution by their peers, but even worse when university faculty support the persecution. No wonder, according to AMCHA, that universities with faculty who support the BDS movement were three to seven times more likely to suffer attacks on Jewish identity. In fact, AMCHA found that “twenty percent of threats to Jewish identity took place at events supported by academic faculty.”
Sadly, without federal intervention, there’s little hope universities will stop antisemitic attacks. Tragically,
While violations of Title VI do not carry criminal penalties, their costs can be massive. First, recipients of federal government funding—which represents millions, even tens of millions of dollars for most universities—can be refused or revoked. Second, the OCR can require that causes of violations be remedied—ensuring Jewish students will no longer suffer attacks by students or faculty for their Zionist beliefs. Tird, the reputational damage caused by civil rights violations can wreak untold damage on university fundraising and student recruitment efforts.
Attacks against Jewish students represent an assault on the American social fabric and our democracy. Higher-education administrators should be ordered by their regents to shut down all forms of antisemitism, especially in the form of discriminatory, demonizing anti-Zionism. Schools that fail to suppress these acts of hate should be prosecuted aggressively under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Punishment must be costly, painful and swiſt. Jewish students deserve better than the current hostile environment on campus. Tey deserve justice.
This message has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 3460, Berkeley, CA 94703 James Sinkinson, President Gerardo Joffe (z"l), Founder
FLAME is a tax-exempt, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization. Its purpose is the research and publication of facts regarding developments in the Middle East and exposing false propaganda that might harm the United States, Israel and other allies in the region. You tax-deductible contributions are welcome.
To receive free FLAME updates, visit our website:
www.factsandlogic.org
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100
