Woodfi nes


Dispelling the myths around criminal defence solicitors


Mike Hayward and Nathan Taylor-Allkins, Criminal and Regulatory compliance solicitors from Woodfi nes in Milton Keynes, provide an insight into common myths surrounding working in a life of crime: T e popularity of crime dramas on TV appears to be as high as


ever with a wealth of UK and US-based crime programmes available on demand on a range of viewing platforms. Whilst they make for gripping watching, the reality of being accused of a crime and involved in the criminal justice system in England and Wales is normally a very diff erent and far less comfortable experience. Many people will have heard on the news the dire state the criminal


justice system is currently in, with huge backlogs in cases in both the Magistrates and Crown Courts, leaving witnesses and victims, and, of course, defendants waiting years for their cases to be heard. If you have ever faced an interview under caution conducted by


the Police, Health and Safety Executive, Local Authority Enforcement, HMRC or Financial Conduct Authority (to name but a few), you will have heard these immortal words: “You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if


you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.” T at will never happen to me, I hear you say. But as solicitors


specialising in supporting businesses and people facing any form of regulatory or criminal investigation, we know that people from all walks of life and professions fi nd themselves being interviewed under caution. T is can be a traumatic experience for anyone who is not conditioned to the world of criminal law. We support a full range of clients who are


invited to interview on a voluntary basis or having been arrested, and undertake this role with the discretion it deserves. It is common for us to be instructed post-interview when it is diffi cult to unpick what may have been inadvertently stated in interview or misrepresented under the pressure that is faced. Whilst we can supply statements to the enforcement body, we always urge people to seek support for the actual interview itself. Early intervention is key and maximises the opportunity to advance a defence, mitigate or challenge the facts. We hear a lot that ‘asking for a solicitor at


the police station will make me look guilty’ or ‘I haven’t done anything wrong so why would I need a solicitor?’. There is also a common misconception that solicitors just advise their


26 ALL THINGS BUSINESS


Mike Hayward (left) & Nathan Taylor- Allkins


Criminal and Regulatory


Compliance Solicitors at Woodfi nes


clients to say the well-known phrase ‘No comment’. T is just simply isn’t the case. It is important to view a call to an interview as a


meeting in which you need to: - establish the facts - ensure you have ‘equality of arms’ (knowledge of the law and legal process remit) - ensure you make informed decisions at all stages as to what you should say and when you should say it.


Above all, having a lawyer is not about seeking to ‘get off ’ an allegation but to ensure your case is advanced clearly and cautiously to ensure your account is understood. After all, the record of interview will be used in any decision as to what, if any, action is to be taken, or will be referred to in court. Often, an enforcement offi cer will have spent


considerable time investigating an incident or regulatory breach. T ey have the alleged evidence, an interview plan and are often double crewed, so to speak, in interview. It is perfectly legal and acceptable to have your own support. In fact, it is a sign of the allegation being taken responsibly – whether it is an accusation against you in your personal capacity or on behalf of a company.


If you require assistance from our Crime and Regulatory team, contact us at mail@woodfi nes.co.uk or call 01908 202150


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50