search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
‘catches a cold’. On this occasion, of course, the global benefits look positive for food and feed producers. It’s not always the case, however. In addition, what goes up also has a tendency to go down again


in the future. By all means ride the wave, but don’t expect it to last for ever.


And finally Br…t! At least I’ve left the dreaded B-word section until now. If you’re still reading (thank you by the way) you really only have yourself to blame. Actually, my focus has switched in recent days from wondering


what might or might not happen to the withdrawal agreement, backstop and the rest, between now (late April) and October 31, to pondering how British farm and feed business leaders will fare in Brussels throughout our ‘winter of indecision’. I would have written ‘summer of indecision’ but that doesn’t work


on so many different levels. I also suspect it will be winter before we get this sorted, in any case. Anyway, my consideration of us, the EU and the next six months,


was prompted by a blog written by Scottish farmer, Jimmy Ireland. He chairs NFU Scotland’s livestock committee and recently attended a series of meetings in Brussels to discuss beef sector issues with representatives from other European farming unions. The first day of his visit was spent discussing the impact on


European livestock production of the drought which hit much of the continent last year; longer-term threats posed by climate change issues and the immediate horrors attached to the European Commission’s determination to continue negotiations with the South American trading bloc Mercosur. All this was done within the safe and welcoming confines of


Copa-Cogeca, the European body which represents both farmers and farm cooperative in Europe, including non-EU members such as Switzerland. The agenda on day two, however, shifted to discussions between


the representative farming group and European Commission officials, a change of focus which Mr Ireland found less comfortable than his first day experience. “Attending these meetings at a time when the UK was expected to


have already departed the European Union left me feeling like I was in limbo,” he wrote on the NFU Scotland website. “I was eager to contribute to discussions but was left unsure of how


relevant our views are to our French and German counterparts and how relevant the future direction of the European Union would be to farmers and crofters back in Scotland.” When I originally researched the post-Brexit status of similar UK


organisations during the immediate aftermath of the referendum vote, the general response was that very little would change, with Switzerland being regularly held up as a prime example of a non-EU state that enjoyed representative peace and harmony. Reading Mr Ireland’s real-life 2019 experience of feeling less


relevant during European Commission sessions, suggests the truth may differ from the many promises made during pre-Brexit times. Now, where have I heard that before?


www.biochem.net Feed Safety for Food Safety®


E.C.O.TRACE®


MULTI SPECIES


Contact:    


SMALL INPUT – GREAT EFFECT


  


FEED COMPOUNDER MAY/JUNE 2019 PAGE 15 19-04-15 HW Anzeige - E.C.O.Trace - 86x254 mm.indd 1 23.04.2019 14:49:24


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68