search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
fire safety


Hitting the roof of fire prevention A


recent devastating fire at a hospital research centre in Manchester has highlighted,


once again, the potential risks of using naked flames in roofing works. It may seem obvious that using naked


flame application, with blowtorches and canisters, runs the risk of fire; yet misconceptions mean the technique is still widely used. “Many people habitually specify


bitumen felt, believing it’s the fastest and most-cost-effective option,” said Dean Grady, product manager at Sika Sarnafil. “However, few realise the full risks of


application and have ill-founded perceptions about flame-free alternatives. “The truth is that safer alternatives,


such as single-ply, provide the same degree of, or in many instances increased, waterproofing longevity while still being budget friendly and rapid to install.”


Changing perceptions Progression relies on innovation and embracing new technologies, he added. “Specifying naked flame-applied


roofing systems for sensitive areas when they are so dependent on the expertise of the installer, seems like a backwards step,” said Grady. Naked flame application is also


coupled with other hazards, such as the health and safety of installers working with hot bitumen. Canisters must be caged and chained


up when they are not in use, another cost and time implication, whereas a flame-free alternative completely eliminates this issue. “Countless hospital flat roofs in the


UK are covered by bituminous systems,” said Grady. “For many refurbishment projects,


specifiers quickly opt for repairs, or an overlay, of the same roof covering, requiring naked flame works. “But, what may seem like a cost-


effective decision in the short term can actually be far from it when considering the whole-life cost of the product, including maintenance and the risk of fire.” Alternative methods such as single ply can eradicate the need for naked


flames on site and can upgrade a roof’s thermal performance. In addition, works can be carried out when buildings are in use, minimising disruption. Modern roofing products utilise


a minimal amount of hot air welding applied through 20-40mm nozzles and directed accurately onto non- combustible substrates, making for a much-safer option.


Don’t take the risk Grady said: “In this day and age, when we have high-quality, viable and cost- effective alternatives; the worry of fire shouldn’t have to be a concern. “Instead, we are still seeing the


devastating effects on hospitals and other public buildings across the country. “The bottom line should always be


the safety of roofers and the public. “In response to the evidence,


building owners and managers should look towards flame-free technologies to avoid the risks of huge disruption and financial impact in the future.”


gbr.sarnafil.sika.com healthcaredm.co.uk 57


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63