search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
strategy


T


he Government has announced plans to drive transformation in the primary care sector within


the next five years, with thousands of GP practices destined for closure and over 7,500 surgeries becoming 1,500 ‘super practices’. The initiative is part of a campaign


to improve access to services in the community, together with increased access to GPs in the evenings and at weekends. With recruitment of GPs remaining


challenging, compounded with a retirement bubble in the GP sector that sees practitioners retiring and leaving the sector for good with no natural succession, primary care is under pressure. Factor in urban regeneration, the


Government’s initiatives to sanction greenfield developments across the UK, an increase in immigration, and a shift for current GPs towards ‘part-time’ working; and it seems there is necessity for a change of practice.


Fit for the future? The NHS currently commissions healthcare services from a great deal of property which may be poorly utilised, some of which may not be suitable to meet future population needs. The healthcare sector needs


transformation, new vision, greater investment, and better property utilisation. With more than 550 GP surgeries


having closed in England since 2012, the remaining surgeries have, over the last 10 years, expanded to take on an 18% increase in patients. Larger super surgeries with 50,000-


plus patients may herald that step change, providing better patient care and offering services now normally only found in hospitals. With such change in dynamics in the


primary healthcare sector, this is partially the reason for the shift to working at scale, leading to the new ‘super practice’ model sometimes being a viable solution. The capital value of the property with


existing practices may be a driver for the super practice.


Hundreds of GP surgeries are expected to come together to form ‘super practices’ With interest rates being exceptionally


low, it follows that investment yields are also low, which drives up the capital value of surgery premises. While beneficial for retiring, or near-


to-retiring GPs; such high capital values often deter younger GPs looking to buy into an existing partnership.


Safety in numbers Issues include the long-term suitability of some properties, and GPs being reluctant to take on a significant share of the equity within an existing building when partnerships consist of no more than a handful of partners. Super practices accommodating as


many as 50 partners provide safety in numbers, with reduced fractional risk per partner. But how will super practice property


ownership be dealt with? It may be that the property will be


conveyed into the super practice. Other super practices may also


consider leaving the property with the individual partners. The outcome in each case does


appear to depend on the age profile of the individual partners, together with details of the outstanding mortgages. The existing mortgages may have


many years to run, or were granted at high interest rates, resulting in there being high redemption charges to exit those mortgages, often rendering the property illiquid. For leasehold premises, the


partnership is not a single entity and therefore cannot take a lease in the partnership name. The individual partners are tenants


under a lease. Not all partners will need to be


individually named as it is capped at six.


However, those named tenants should be no more liable than the other partners if the partnership agreement has been drafted correctly to include joint and several liability.


New opportunities With practices coming towards the end of their first leases, many of the original doctors could have retired and many may not have had their names removed from the lease before doing so. It follows that those retired doctors


remain liable for obligations under the lease, including payment of rent and any dilapidations for wear and tear to the building, until succeeded. With leases coming to an end, this


does present further opportunities for many practices. Many of those premises are still


suitable for the provision of healthcare, although a refurbishment may be long overdue. The granting of a new lease creates a


significant improvement in the investment value for the landlord. It may also be the case that the


landlord is required to undertake refurbishment of the premises in return for a new lease being granted, all at a rent commensurate with the refurbishment that has been undertaken. There is much to be considered with


the advent of super practices to ensure that issues of property, albeit freehold or leasehold, are considered. Putting property to one side for a


moment, a fundamental reason for the super practice is that it will ensure the delivery of improved healthcare services for the community.


www.primarycaresurveyors.com


8 healthcaredm.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63