search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
infection control – special report


Copper also remains effective even


after repeated wet and dry abrasion and recontamination and these properties last the lifetime of the product. There is a lack of evidence of long-term efficacy of other materials under real-life conditions. These benefits, and low maintenance


needs, are making copper products much more widely specified within contemporary hospital architecture and design. Speaking to hdm, Angela Vessey,


director of the Copper Development Association, explains: “There is a solid and growing evidence base that really confirms that copper and copper alloy touch surfaces are a useful extra measure to boost infection control. “They are effective against bacteria –


even antibiotic-resistant strains like MRSA and VRE – fungi, and none has been to survive on a copper or copper alloy surface.”


One of the leading copper research


centres in the work is the University of Southampton and it boldly broadcast a live laboratory trial conducted by Professor Bill Keevil in which antimicrobial copper was shown to eradicate 10,000,000 MRSA bacteria in just eight minutes. An academic paper based on this


research and published in the Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology concluded: “This study is the first to show very-rapid killing of fingertip contamination of MRSA and MSSA on copper alloys, and the authors propose that incorporation of copper alloy surfaces may help to reduce the transmission of MRSA and MSSA from contaminated surfaces.”


The path of destruction Clinical studies in the UK and the US were the first to confirm the laboratory efficacy, reporting >80% reduction of bacteria on copper surfaces. In a US ICU trial in three hospitals, an


associated 58% reduction in infections was reported. This evidence base continues to expand, with further studies conducted in different healthcare systems, clinical areas, touch surface components, and local strains of bacteria, each helping to further prove the efficacy of copper for long-term, wide-spectrum infection prevention and control. In particular, the research has provided


evidence to support the specification of copper for key touch surfaces within hospitals, including bed rails, drip stands, keyboards, taps, handrails, door handles, and push plates. Vessey said: “The way in which


copper works totally destroys the DNA of the bacteria, so there is no chance of


horizontal gene transfer, the way in which bacteria can share resistance. As such, its use is becoming increasingly significant in the drive to tackle antimicrobial resistance.” Specification of antimicrobial copper is


currently still a local decision, often led by an enlightened champion. The expanding evidence base should start to be reflected in more-official guidance recognising the use of copper as key to infection prevention in hospitals. In fact, Health Protection Scotland


recently reviewed evidence from 18 articles covering 14 scientific studies and made a ‘Recommendation for Clinical Practice’ stating: “Copper alloy environmental and equipment surfaces may be considered for high-touch sites (eg bed rails) as an additional measure to supplement existing procedures for routine cleaning, but does not replace the requirement for routine cleaning to be performed.” Vessey is hoping other countries in


the UK will now follow suit. “It’s about prioritising the touch


points that are most highly contaminated and frequently touched and in the areas where the most vulnerable patients are housed, for


34 healthcaredm.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63