search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UK LEGAL


The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Gambling Reform


Northridge Law’s Melanie Ellis asks, “Do the APPG’s latest recommendations undermine the licensed market?”


T


he All-Party Parliamentary Group on Gambling Reform (“APPG”) and Peers for Gambling Reform are informal cross-party groups of politicians, the APPG having a stated purpose of assessing “how the gambling industry should be reformed to prevent harm”. Their latest report, “Gambling Advertising, Marketing and Sponsorship: Recommendations for Reform”, sets out a case for increased restrictions on gambling advertising across all channels. The report starts from the premise that gambling advertising is a cause of harm, on the basis that advertising can cause people


20 MAY 2026


to gamble and gambling can cause harm. Whilst the two individual steps in the APPG’s case are difficult to argue against, the conclusion is problematic. It does not necessarily follow that gambling advertising is a direct cause of gambling- related harm. We obviously can’t say, for example, that hunger causes us to eat, eating causes obesity, therefore hunger causes obesity. More importantly, the APPG fails to properly address the unintended consequences of restricting gambling advertising and whether they might cause greater harm than the


advertising itself.


As with other potentially harmful products, such as alcohol and high sugar snacks, some restrictions are justified to protect young and vulnerable consumers. But if those restrictions become excessive, this creates a perfect storm for black market supply of the product. Consumers will seek unregulated sources of the product and unregulated suppliers will appear to fill that need, prohibition in 1920s America being a perfect example. Gambling is particularly vulnerable to this effect, given the ease with which


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76