SUSTAINABLE WATER AND ENERGY USAGE WHY IT BELONGS IN YOUR SUSTAINABILITY
Al Kingsley MBE, CEO of NetSupport explains how greener IT can create sweeter results, and how smarter tech can cut carbon and costs in confectionery manufacturing.
T
he confectionery industry is no stranger to innovation. Whether it’s developing new flavours, adjusting recipes to meet dietary trends or
fine-tuning production lines for higher yields, change is part of the job. But alongside these creative and operational shifts, there’s another transformation taking place: the drive towards net zero. While most environmental conversations
in confectionery manufacturing focus on sustainable sourcing, energy-efficient machinery, or packaging innovation, there’s an often-overlooked contributor to carbon emissions – information technology (IT). From the Enterprise Resource Planning
(ERP) systems managing raw ingredients to the tablets tracking quality control on the shop floor, IT underpins almost every element of modern confectionery production. The way we purchase, maintain and manage those systems has a direct impact on energy use, costs, and carbon footprint. And with a few smart adjustments, IT can move from being a hidden source of emissions to an active enabler of sustainability. In a confectionery business, precision
matters. A delay in a temperature-controlled storage area can ruin a batch of chocolates; a fault in a packing line can hold up deliveries to major retailers. IT systems help avoid these costly disruptions, but they also come with their own environmental price tag. Every server, monitor, and barcode scanner has an embedded carbon footprint from manufacturing and shipping. Once in operation, they draw power, sometimes 24/7, even when not in use. And when something goes wrong, IT support teams often have to travel to remote factories or distribution hubs, adding transport emissions to the tally. These costs add up, particularly in companies running multiple production lines across several
locations. But addressing them doesn’t have to mean ripping out infrastructure. By making deliberate choices – extending the life of devices, reducing travel and optimising energy use – confectionery manufacturers can cut emissions while improving operational resilience.
Extending device lifecycles In many businesses, replacing devices every two to three years is treated as a necessity, even when those devices are still perfectly serviceable. The result? Higher costs, more e-waste and more emissions from manufacturing and delivery. In confectionery production, tablets used
for tracking ingredient batches, or ruggedised laptops for machinery diagnostics, don’t always need the latest specs to perform well. The real challenge is knowing when devices genuinely need replacing and when they can be maintained for another year or two. This is where centralised device management
comes in. With the right platform, IT teams can monitor performance across the entire device estate, from head office PCs to shop- floor workstations. They can roll out updates remotely, track usage patterns, and identify devices that are slowing down so they can be fixed before they fail. By extending device lifecycles,
46 • KENNEDY’S CONFECTION • AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2025
manufacturers not only reduce e-waste but also avoid the financial and logistical headaches of frequent replacements. That means fewer disruptions to production, and more budget available for strategic investment.
Cutting travel with remote IT support Confectionery manufacturing often involves geographically spread facilities: production plants, packaging sites, distribution centres, and sometimes even retail spaces. In traditional IT support models, a malfunctioning printer in a warehouse or a network outage in a packing hall might trigger an on-site visit, potentially hours of travel for an issue that could be resolved in minutes. Remote access tools change that. With
secure, real-time access, IT teams can log in to a device from anywhere, diagnose the problem, apply a fix and have the system back online without stepping foot on site. For confectionery operations working to
tight deadlines, where a stoppage in one area can cascade into production delays, this is more
plan
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60