search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEA


FEAT RE ATURE


D


DIISTRIIB


BUTIION O N


Helping the distribution channe l to support brand loyalty


Jean-Loui Ev Jean-Louis Eva Evans, the connectionbetw the connection betwetween environmental testing and brandloya


vans, Managing Director at TÜV SÜDProduct Servi e explores weenenvironmental testing andbrand loyalty


anagingDirector at TÜV SÜDProduct Serv rvice explores yalty


environmental conditionswould give an acceptable level of confidence. A useful reference is the guidance set out by the International Safe Transit Association (ISTA), which provides test standards for different classes of packages in the distributio n environment.


WHAT AT A E THE TESTS ? T ARE THE TESTS? ST Packages are subj bjected to controlled


conditions of temperature and humidity to establish a baseline condition for


subsequent tests to simulate conditions experienced in the distribution environment. A compression test simulates the load applied by a stack of packages in storage. Deformation of the package


ge ge to an extent


where the product inside starts to support the loadwould be considered a failure, as would asymmetric deformationwhich could cause a stack above to topple.


To ensure test repeatability, bounce tests are performed on a test apparatus. Both bounce and vibration tests can be


A t first the connection between


environmental testing and brand loyalty is not immediately obvious, but the two key drivers of brand loyalty, serv


rvice and product


quality can both be beneficially influenced by testing. For example, performing


environmental testing to ensure that a product delivers against expectations of quality andmaintains its desirable features when exposed to adverse conditionswill support brand loyalty. Likewise, safe delivery of a product is a significant element of the serv


rvice provided. Failure of product packaging during


distribution is the source ofmany complaints and poor customer experien cewill influenc e the purchaser’s future choice ofwhere they purchase from. Packaging is not that


uncommon, and it is vital to test packaging efficiency to ensure it can protect the product in the distribution supply chain .


A HIGHER TANDARD HIGHER STA ANDARD


Many designersmake themistake of thinking that ensuring products complywith


rvive the distribution chain,which is often themost severe environment that the productwill encounter during its life. So, howdo you approach environmental testing in the distribution environment? Firstly youmust consider the environments that the productwill experience - frombeing


mandatory tests set out in product standards is enough. However,mandatory tests rarely provide confidence that the productwill surv


8 SEP EMBER 201 SEPTEMBER 2016 | ELEC RO ELECTRONICS CS


UNDERSTASTANDING THE DISTRIBUTION ENVIRONMENT


UNDERSTANDING HE DIS RIBU ION ENVIRONMEN


If you knowthe limits of the environmental threat in the distribution environment and you knowhowrobust your product is, you can procure packaging thatwill protect your product. Robustness can be assessed by conducting a fragility assessment,which requires the application of increasing environmental stress until failure occurs. Once fragility has been determined it can be comparedwith the known threats in the distribution environment. The difference between the two being the protection th e packaging is required to provide. Fragility assessments and specific


transportation characterisation aremore commonly reserv


rved for products that


absolutelymustwork out of the box. For the maj


ajority of packaged products, testing to levels that represent the common expected


TÜV SÜD Product Service www.tuv-sud.co.uk


www.tuv-sud.co.uk T: 01489 558100


/ ELECTRONICS ELECTRONICS


packaged to its final delivery destination. Vibration, bounce and shock are always experienced during transportation, their severity varyingwith the choice of transport vehicle Similarly the climatic environment may have extreme temperatures; often combinedwith humidity and pressure.While most transportation platformswill provide some thermal protection, the longer the journey the greater the likelihood that extremes of temperature, both hot and cold, will be experienced during the distributio n process.


.


Figure 1: Vibrat


Figure 1: shakers


performedwith top loads applied to the packages to simulate transportation of a stack of packages.


Vibration testing using onet of TUV SUD's large


of TUV S D's large shakers


ation esting using one rs


Side impact tests are performed to replicate lateral loads thatmight occur duringmachine handling. Impacts up to 5mph are produced by running the packag e down an inclined plane into awell supported target facedwithwooden planks.


Precision drop testmachines are often used to performthis test, although other test facilitiesmay be necessarywhere the package is particularly large. In essence the test is defined by the orientation of the package, its drop height and the surface that it hits.


Packaging effective enough to surv rigours of an often poorlymonitored and hazardous distribution environment has become an essential part of the serv provided by the retailer. Relatively simple testingwill provide the confidence that the packaging is effectiv e and that the produc t will arrive securely at its destination ready to exhibit those qualities that produce brand loyalty.


MEE ING CUSTOMER EXPECTATCTATIONS When cultivating brand loyalty it is easy to focus on product quality and concentrate efforts on producing an exceptional product, amaged in transit this realisedby thepurchaser. rvive the


MEETING CUSTO OMER EXPECTA IONS


qualitymaynever be re but if the product is d


rc rvice


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56