FEAT RE FEA ATURE
D
DIISTRIIB
BUTIION O N
IOT DEVICES PRESENT UNIQU E SOURCING CHALLENGE S
and EMEAOperati ns at America II investi ates the rol of the distributer i
The Intern and EMEA
Internet of thn thiings (Io ) h s im EA O erations atAmerica II
(IoT) has impacte ve
every i dustry PA
who canprice themselves according to the needs of this ‘midtier’ is a challenge companies strugglewith. Anot
gemany other fe ft feature
oftensimplysensorsorother low sophisticateddev ‘latestandgre suchthere
reatest’ inpro
cheaper, low ge re
geometries. Infact,give require
romtheopenmarke rt re rementsof IoT ev evices thatdonot require owe
reof IoTdevices is that theyare ow-end, less re
ev rethe
remaybeacasefor sourcingtheolder, ower-marginpartsonlow ventherelative re
rocessingtechnology rc
werpro velylow
whatwouldactuallybere
ket. Inthis case, it’s like require
ket capabilities. oc
rocess ow
alsoanargument for sourcingobsoleteparts fro
rt kely
fairlyuniqueblendofaccess tofranchiselines, alongsideopenmarke
redwouldbea ra
KEEPINGHERIGH BALA ACROSS HE SUPPL
KEEPING HE RIGHTBALANCE RIGHALANCERIGHT AC
Turning to look againat the fact that the maj
CROSSTHESUPPLY CHAINLYCHAIN ajority of IoTcustomers are
ge
orbes predicts that by2025 approximately 80billiondeviceswill be connectedto the Internet (comparedto the 11 billiondev connectedtoday). Furt
F evices thatmore thanhalf ofmaj
processes andsystemswill incorporate some element of the IoTby2020andalso that by 2018, sixbillion‘things’willhave the ability to autonomously re Withsuchstro
ve
request support via the IoT. rongpre
The IoT, andwiththe explosionof the IoT devicemarke
ket already appare
However designing andsourcing for devices intendedto serve the re Internet ofThings pre ord
designing IoTdev ow
rv require rder to alignwiththe sourc rements of the
of IoTdesigns, distributorshave topresent a fairlyunusual blendof skills. Firstly, it’swort
resents aunique case. In rcing require re
rthconsidering the type and
size of company that commonly turns itshan d to IoTdesigns.Whilenot exc
xclusively the case,
‘mid-sized’ and‘mid-tier’ companies (interms of bothsize andre ov rwove
verwhelmingly re re resente
revenue) appear tobe representedinthepool of
companies designing IoTdevices. Yet it is exactly these companies that are thewors repre
re tedbycurre 10 10 SEP EMBER 201 rentdistributionmod SEPTEMBER 2016 | ELEC RO ELECTRONICS CS odels. rst- rements rent, it’s
unsurprising that somany companies are curre
re
rently committing considerable resourc evices.
re rce to redictions for the future of re
rthermore,Gartner claims ajornewbusiness ra
bigge rt
Ask anymid-sizedcompanywhat their gest issues are
rewiththeir distribution partner andyo you’ll likely ge
the same answer; ‘they’re don’t give
don’thave capabili veus the ti
This is amaj get some variationon
me of day, or too small and re either tier one and
ties our business re companies inthe IoTspace.
Tier one distributorshave ahabit of frequently ov
ove verlooking everyt ything
volume business fromlarger OEMs/ODMs. It’shardto ge you’re attempting to
ge rd look-inif yo
place a smallerHighMix Low ft
case for IoTdevice Volume order (as i
for low require
s so oftenthe ow
rements)
ow-margincomponents. Onthe flipside, smaller and
independent distributors,whichm well care
customers,may ge resourc
rces or stock
re toprioritisemid-sized genera
access to ensure rallynothav
r
e e
or reliability that their IoTcustomerneeds. It’s clear that, as a company sourc for anIoTdesign, yo a ro
serve
rock andahard rv
I T u i rcingparts rt
you’re oftencaught between rdplace, andwill usuallynot be
vedwell by eithermodel. Finding someone America II
www.americaii.com www.americaii.com E:
sales@americaii.com / ELECTRONICS ELECTRONICS o so rcng. get a
largest
orders.Their businessmod shareholder priorities dictate that t ones favourhighmargin,high ro
“Smaller “Sm er and independent
customers,may generally not have the resources or stock access to ensure the volume or reliability th
customers,
distributors, which may well care to prioritisem d-sized ly
and i dependent wh
may a we
care to prioritise mid-sized ay
y generally not have
the resources or stock access to ensure the volum or reliability that their IoT customer needs...
their IoT customer needs. ”
ty require ajor issue for thesemid-tier res.’ Figure 1: Figure 1:
More than half of major new business processes and systems will incorporate some element of the IoT by 2020
More than half of maj
ajor new business
processes and systems will incorporate some element of the IoT by 2020
companies Holding excess stock simply isn’t anoptionfor companies of this size due to the capital losses invo
rticularly import .
independents tohelpthemmanage gain, there bepart of the sourc genera
volved.Oftenthey’ll turnto ge the
process ofholding andshifting excess stock. Aga
So, typically, this is the choice that IoT designers ge
satisfy this ‘meltingpot’ of apparently ng require
p s
e t
h
le su ourci
rally face inattempting to re
ppliers, (eachfulfilling a rements; either
e element of the sourc o
m r
thre ema
rcing
), or else attempt to turnto of the fewdistributors in rke
ket that cansatisfy reliable long-term
ra
o n s
u
arke requirements, at the ght price andpriority,while o offering inventory age
anchise supply andopen t re
ve thre ry
well- tors
me value-addedservices to respeccing andre are
gement (andpotentially va
rv redesign ).
alignedto theneeds of ewandfar
re few
re canbe seena clear case for this to rcingmix for IoTcompanies.
re ‘midsized’
companies, another factor that begs to enter themix is inventorymanagement; something that is part
rtant for these types of
oTdevices, thereis sometimes rc
gy.As re
IOT DEVICES PRESENT UNIQUE SOURCING CHALLENGES
cted almost evst everyvery industry.Here Jed Pecchol Pres ent APA C vestigates the role of the distributer in designing IoT evdevices
ry. Here Jed Pecchiioli, Presiident,, APAC designi g I T devices
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56