search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
I


t was a theme Maria Giovanna Vianello, global leadership development director at Novartis, deftly identified in


her day one keynote, ‘A Human- Centric Approach to Technological Change in HR’. Vianello compared the number


of Google hits for the search terms ‘AI’ and ‘skill mapping’. Surprisingly given both the heat and hopes around AI, she found that search volumes for skill mapping outweighed those for AI. The reality check underscored


the key message from Vianello’s session: that engagement with any change, be it transformation, merger or acquisition, or the introduction of new technology, is less about what is changing and more about how it is changing for people involved. It is about listening to what’s really going on, understanding the data, asking what value will this bring and responding with people in mind.


SKILL MAPPING Skill mapping remains an essential tool for responding with agility where tech and other factors are rapidly changing service delivery and business models. The entire process, which technology again can make more efficient, creates workforce engagement and value for businesses, both of which are especially important now as


business looks to serve employees as well as shareholders. The relevance of skill mapping


exercises was also emphasised in the seminar, ‘The Great Balancing Act: Research-based tips for keeping performance high and people happy.’ Referring to data from the company’s Annual Pulse of Talent survey, Alastair Logan, director of value advisory at Dayforce, talked through the trade-offs for leaders around the survey’s three key areas of agility and stability, productivity and flexibility, efficiency and empathy. One of the most striking


messages around employee engagement and retention was the potential for internal mobility. Four in ten of the 8,700 people surveyed across the UK, US and Australia said their skillset matched another role in the organisation better. A further 81% said they had experienced burnout symptoms over the past 12 months. Another 69% deemed themselves to be a flight risk from the organisation. All the figures point to widespread under- engagement, under-performance and sub-optimal wellbeing. With the impact of demographic


change and employee wellbeing front of mind for businesses, skill mapping – especially given the rise in conversations around skills-based pay – has become an even more business-critical activity.


AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE Internal talent mobility and skill mapping are not novel ideas in global mobility or across other corporate functions. People with key skills have been moved across borders on assignments to deliver value for the individual’s career as well as for the organisation at large, including host teams and colleagues, for decades. Nevertheless, Dayforce’s findings


reiterate the strategic importance of the global mobility function and its links with talent management and value creation. Interestingly, Maria Giovanna


Vianello’s presentation also featured the experience


of her


one-year international assignment from Europe to Asia and the skill mapping exercise she was tasked to


28


deliver there. She described the personal


challenges of feeling like she had taken on an almost impossible task – one where two external consultant-led projects had not quite fully delivered on previously – and experienced the challenges common to many when taking on an international assignment. Yet with tenacity, resilience


and the support of her colleagues, she overcame these familiar international assignment challenges to deliver on an opportunity she had worked hard to make happen. She talked with people in the manufacturing facility to find out how she could understand their role and what they needed going forward to perform in their part of the organisation. After two or three months of


conversations, the reality was that specific skill mapping was needed because of


the transition in the


workforce from one generation to the next because of retirement, said Vianello. The data-gathering stage mapped 150 job roles, complying strictly with data protection laws, and enabled the identification of 67 key skills. These included prioritising skills around dealing with complexity and strategic focus, which had become more important. From an adoption and value


delivery perspective, the skill map was hugely successful for the business and for Vianello, who was promoted for her project’s outcomes. The skills map became the global standard and positively changed the working lives of her colleagues in the manufacturing facility. Returning to the region a few years ago after the assignment in 2014, Vianello was made aware of the lasting impact of her work. “I focused on adoption and that


made a huge difference,” she said, in a message relevant for everyone involved in introducing new ways of working. “We in HR can create value for the business, but we have to listen. We can really be disruptors when it comes to the adoption of new tech. We should be the orchestrators and help to connect the dots in the organisation, but for that, we have to start conversations and listen.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106